To their shame, Republicans and undemocratic Dems are united on all things Russia and Ukraine.
Both right wings of the US one-party state support Nazi-infested tyranny in Ukraine.
They back using its territory as a platform for perpetual US-dominated NATO proxy war on Russia — by use of expendable Ukrainian foot soldiers.
The US/West doesn’t give a hoot about Ukraine and rights of its long-suffering people.
Uncaring about how they’re abused and otherwise exploited, Ukrainian sovereignty ceased to exist post-the Obama/Biden regime 2014 Maidan coup in Kiev.
Eliminated under US control, its Nazified and conscript military has been badly battered and beaten for over over two months — with no end of attrition in its ranks as long as Russia’s SMO continues.
In response to the 2001 9/11 mother of all state-sponsored false flags to that time, congressionally adopted Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) empowered the (Bush/Cheney regime) to use all “necessary and appropriate force” against invented enemies.
No real ones existed then or now.
So they were invented over two decades ago to rape and destroy one nation after another — mass-murdering hundreds of thousands, immiserating survivors.
Is history repeating with waging escalated war on Russia in mind?
On Sunday, GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger announced the following:
“I’m introducing (another) AUMF as a clear redline so the (Biden regime) can take appropriate action should Russia use chemical, biological, and/or nuclear weapons (sic).”
“We must stand up for humanity (sic), and we must stand with our (vassal state) allies (sic).”
“As the (fake Biden) said, Putin must be stopped (sic).”
“Accordingly, the (regime he nominally heads) should have the authority and means to take the necessary actions to do so.”
The bill titled “To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces to defend the territorial integrity of US (vassal state) allies,” allows the (fake Biden) to determine if Russia used WMDs (sic).
The AUMF no longer applies when dementia Joe’s double certifies to Congress that the territorial integrity of Ukraine has been restored (sic).”
Will Kinzinger and likeminded lunatics infesting the Washington asylum cross a rubicon of no return by attacking Russia?
Will their collective derangement risk destruction of planet earth and all its life forms in pursuit of their diabolical imperial aims?
Are things on a path toward what’s unthinkable?
Hegemon USA has been perpetually at war on invented enemies throughout most of its history from inception.
Will attacking Russia be the next shoe to drop by shifting from proxy war to direct confrontation?
Will it follow a US/Western or Ukrainian-staged false flag — like earlier ones, this time with chemical, biological and/or radiological weapons — once again wrongfully accusing Russia for what it had nothing to do with.
Is that where things are heading?
Kinzinger is delusional, depraved and deranged.
Earlier calling for a US/NATO enforced no-fly zone over Ukrainian airspace, he ignored a virtually certain clash between alliance regimes and Russia to follow the move if authorized and implemented.
It remains to be seen if Congress will adopt another AUMF and what may follow if this step is taken.
Infested with dominant lunatics at war on humanity at home and worldwide, hegemon USA represents an unparalleled threat to everyone everywhere.
Kinzinger’s AUMF is the latest example of collective derangement in the empire of lies.
In all of modern history, the world has never had a worse group of leaders than it does right now, and the fate of civilization is literally in their hands. If both sides continue to escalate matters, the proxy war in Ukraine will eventually become a shooting war between the United States and Russia. And once a shooting war between the United States and Russia starts, it will only be a matter of time before it goes nuclear. It is often said that there are no winners in a nuclear war, and that is certainly true. But if a nuclear war becomes inevitable, you definitely want to be on the side that strikes first. Because a devastating surprise first strike may not enable you to “win” a nuclear war, but it will certainly give you the best chance of surviving one.
Donald Trump can see where things are heading. This week, he penned the most ominous statement that he has ever issued…
“It doesn’t make sense that Russia and Ukraine aren’t sitting down and working out some kind of an agreement. If they don’t do it soon, there will be nothing left but death, destruction, and carnage. This is a war that never should have happened, but it did. The solution can never be as good as it would have been before the shooting started, but there is a solution, and it should be figured out now—not later—when everyone will be DEAD!”
Like Trump, I am desperately hoping that a negotiated agreement can be reached somehow, because if a full-blown nuclear war erupts billions of people will die.
We must not allow that to happen.
Unfortunately, officials in the U.S. are not taking this threat seriously. In fact, I have been seeing talking heads all over cable news downplaying the threat of nuclear war. These experts assure us that Russia “would never use nuclear weapons”, but meanwhile Russia continues to feverishly prepare for a potential nuclear war with the United States.
In fact, the Russians just conducted a test of the new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile…
Russia has test launched a new intercontinental ballistic missile, raising fears of a further escalation of Vladimir Putin’s barbaric war in Ukraine.
The Russian leader said the Sarmat missile, also known as Satan-2, will provide ‘food for thought for those who try to threaten Russia’ and will make his enemies ‘think twice’.
It is being reported that the Sarmat has a range of 11,000 miles and can hit any target on the entire planet.
It can carry up to 15 independently targetable warheads, and the Russians are bragging that the collective power of those warheads could destroy an area the size of Texas or France.
Remember, this is just one missile that we are talking about. Ultimately, the Russians are planning to put vast numbers of these missiles into service.
According to Vladimir Putin, nobody in the world has anything like these new missiles…
“The new complex has the highest tactical and technical characteristics and is capable of overcoming all modern means of anti-missile defence. It has no analogues in the world and won’t have for a long time to come,” Putin said.
“This truly unique weapon will strengthen the combat potential of our armed forces, reliably ensure Russia’s security from external threats and provide food for thought for those who, in the heat of frenzied aggressive rhetoric, try to threaten our country.”
Sadly, he is right.
The U.S. doesn’t have anything even close.
Minuteman III missiles that went into service in the 1970s are still the backbone of the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal, and they are not scheduled to be replaced by something new until about 2030.
Needless to say, the test of the new Sarmat missile was intended as a message to anyone that is attempting to aid the Ukrainians…
Russia notified the US of the ICBM test launch in accordance with the New Start treaty, but its rhetoric and choice to go ahead with the treaty stands in stark contrast to the US, which had canceled an ICBM test-launch in March not long after Russia began its war on Ukraine. Putin and his aides have repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons in what experts believe to be a ploy to warn powerful countries like the UK, Germany and the US from coming to Ukraine’s aid.
This missile test represents yet another escalation by the Russians, and that is extremely alarming.
But U.S. officials are escalating matters as well. On Wednesday, the Biden administration announced another round of sanctions against Russia…
The United States on Wednesday unveiled its latest round of sanctions going after Russia over its war on Ukraine, this time targeting a key commercial bank and “a global network of more than 40 individuals and entities led by U.S.-designated Russian oligarch Konstantin Malofeyev.”
In a news release, the US Treasury Department said it was also targeting “companies operating in Russia’s virtual currency mining industry, reportedly the third largest in the world,” noting it was the first time it has “designated a virtual currency mining company.”
And the Biden administration is also telling us that another “military aid package” will soon be sent to Ukraine…
The Biden administration is preparing to announce another substantial military aid package for Ukraine this week, five U.S officials tell NBC News. Three officials said the package is expected to be similar in size to the $800 million one the administration announced last week.
Two officials said the package is expected to include more artillery and tens of thousands more artillery rounds, which will likely be critical to the fighting in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.
At this point, we are providing most of the weapons and ammunition for the Ukrainian military, we are constantly providing them with battlefield intelligence, and we are even training their troops on our own soil.
Yes, that last part is actually true. As I have discussed previously, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has publicly admitted that Ukrainian troops are actually being flown to the United States to be trained how to fight the Russians…
“This morning, I had the pleasure of speaking with Ukrainian troops training in the U.S. who are returning home to Ukraine today. Their bravery and skill are amazing. I made clear the U.S. will continue to provide them with the assistance they need.”
Like I said at the beginning of this article, this is a proxy war between the United States and Russia.
If the American people truly understood the implications of what our leaders are doing, there would be massive protests in the streets of every U.S. city right now.
So when will everyone finally wake up?
Hopefully it will be before we get to the “everyone is dead” part of the story.
Today I’d like to share with you a “3-second survival hack” you can use to skyrocket your chances of protecting your loved ones during ANY crisis.
There is a secret dark hidden story of Ukraine of which the Western public opinion knows nothing about.
The image that the people of the Western countries have of Ukraine is one filtered by the MSM. According to this propagandistic and fairy-tale image, there was a successful “democratic transition” in Ukraine that removed “authoritarian figures” in order to finally walk towards liberal democracy.
Of course, we know that this process is called a “colored revolution”, and it is far from being “democratic”. Actually, its features are quite violent and authoritarian as we explained and analyzed in the previous article.
A colored revolution is nothing other than an engineered political process whose only purpose is to overthrow those governments that represent a “threat” for the globalist powers that rule the NATO and the EU.
Ukraine was no exception to this subversive process. Puppet governments were installed in power over the past few years but this country has been far to reach any “democratic” stability.
The governments that were remotely controlled by Washington have turned Ukraine into a hotbed of international crime. There was certainly a geopolitical reason to oust the pro-Russia Presidents who governed Ukraine but, at the same time, there was also a criminal reason.
It is the dark side of Ukraine that the Western MSM is not mentioning in any of its hysterical pro-Nazi propaganda.
Ukraine is the premier country in the world for human trafficking. Children are smuggled from this country to every country in the world.
These children are sold and bought by the international pedophile ring and after the Euromaidan coup backed by George Soros and Barack Obama, this traffic has heavily surged in the country.
Likewise, there is also another dark aspect of Ukraine that concerns the production and development of bioweapons. Certainly, this topic is more current in light of the so-called “pandemic”.
However, in this case, we are not talking about a virus flu like COVID. We are talking about real deadly weapons whose purpose is to exterminate human beings but not every human being. These bioweapons were developed only to exterminate the Russian people.
In order to know why Ukraine is the key to understand this evil plan, we must go back to 2005. At that time, the Ukrainian President was Victor Yuschenko.
Yuschenko was placed in power by the first Ukrainian Orange Revolution that took place in 2004. The Washington deep state was already concerned in that period about Ukraine getting too close to Moscow, exactly like it happened in the second Ukrainian colored revolution, the Euromaidan, much more violent and chaotic than its predecessor.
Obama’s visit to the Ukrainian bio-labs
At that time, a series of official visits of US representatives started in Ukraine. A young and unknown Barack Obama visited Ukraine along with Republican Senator Richard Lugar.
It is certainly interesting that Obama nurtured a deep interest in Ukraine in those years considering the fact that, as President, he was the one who gave the green light to the Euromaidan coup that would take place nine years later.
However, the question that we should ask ourselves is the following. What exactly was Obama doing in Ukraine back in 2005?
The Washington Post, the mouthpiece of the deep state, has the answer. Obama and Lugar had the task to reassure the support of the US government in the financing of Ukrainian bio-labs.
The title of the WP is quite misleading because it pretends that this financial aid was meant to “counter bioweapons.”
However, if we read the article we realize that Washington had no intention of dismantling these facilities.
These labs were the heritage of the Cold War when the USSR, as the US was also, was developing bio-warfare weapons.
The Bush administration’s plan was to update those structures and render them more “safe”. The bioweapons research in Ukraine was not halted: instead, it received direct support from Congress and the US Department of State.
Recently, the MSM has been denying that in these days that there are bio-weapon labs in Ukraine. But the best way to quash their lies is to directly quote their own articles in which Obama is pictured walking in these facilities.
The Kremlin must have suspected that there was something unusual with these trips because the airplane carrying Obama’s delegation was halted by the Russian authorities when it stopped at a Russian airport.
The authorities searched the plane because they probably thought that the reason for these trips could go beyond the range of the institutional visits.
The plan to exterminate the Russian people
However, ever since then the bio-lab activity has been increasing steadily. In November 2017, something very unusual occurred. Russian President, Vladimir Putin, publicly stated that there were foreign subjects on Russian soil who were engaged in anomalous activities, like the collection of Russian DNA samples.
Putin released a statement where he clearly said that someone was keenly interested in the ethnic composition of the Russian population.
Russian secret services began investigating the matter as well as the Council Federation, which is the upper house of the country.
The first deputy chairman of the Federation Council’s Committee for Defense and Security, Franz Klintsevich, clearly hinted at the possibility that someone was working at the production of bioweapons whose main target was the Russian people.
Kilintsevich said that some subjects were working on this scenario and the collection of Russian DNA was part of some bio-war program.
In the following weeks, the shroud of secrecy about the identity of those who were conducting this research was lifted. The US Air Force openly admitted that it was the one who authorized the collecting for the purpose of research related to the musculoskeletal system.
Apparently, the Kremlin did not buy it. The fact that the US military was involved in this “research” was quite suspicious considering the story of biowarfare programs developed by the American intelligence agencies.
However, what is happening today in Ukraine could very well be the missing link and the smoking gun that would confirm that those DNA samples were studied and analyzed in the Ukrainian bio-facilities.
The Russian embassy in Bosnia Herzegovina released an official statement about this matter. The Kremlin diplomats openly denounced the fact that the United States filled “Ukraine with biolabs, which were – very possibly – used to study methods for destroying the Russian people at the genetic level.”
Therefore, Russia is stating that Ukraine was the headquarters of a plan carried out by the US deep state to exterminate the Russian people.
Ukraine was turned by the globalist powers into a rogue state, whose only purpose was to seek a war against Russia and find ways to harm its people in any possible way, including the biochemical “solution”.
Several speculations have arisen in these days about the claim that Russia has detected and destroyed these bio labs.
A website called RealRawNews has reported that Russia has effectively and successfully executed this operation. However, some observers are skeptical about the authenticity of the stories published by RRN because in the past it claimed that there are ongoing military trials at GITMO against deep state bigwigs.
We have managed to find another source who would confirm this report, and it seems to be completely true.
The Russian military has successfully destroyed these labs and it has obtained confidential documents about the research that was conducted there. The purpose of these programs was none other than the extermination of the Russian people.
Globalism has been working on this criminal plan for years. The reason lies in the fact that Russia has been, and still is, the most solid bulwark against the manifestation of the New World Order.
The fact is that Russia rescued Syria from the ISIS attacks that aimed to dismantle the territorial integrity of the country. ISIS is a direct creation of the US deep state, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar.
Likewise, Russia has prevented a further expansion towards the East by NATO, which is not even an Atlantic Alliance like its name claims.
If NATO was truly an Atlantic Alliance, it would have been dissolved after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Instead, the USSR – enemy of the western world – dissolved but NATO kept expanding in the 90s. The goal of NATO is not to protect America and Europe. The goal of this organization is to carry out the blueprint to create a world army. This world army would be the military branch of the world super-government that the architects of the NOW would like to usher in.
Russia has been countering this plan. It has been fighting for preserving the existence of its nation until the Donbass genocide forced Russia to intervene in Ukraine.
Russia has had to enact a military operation to free this country from the horde of Neo-Nazis who were killing innocent civilians in the Donbass region.
At the same time, Russia has had to intervene in order to destroy these bio-facilities that were working on the most criminal plan that has probably been ever conceived by the human mind, which is the entire extermination of a people for political reasons.
Never has there been a more evil and deviant plan than this one. However, it looks like that this plan has just been foiled.
The labs have been destroyed. Ukraine is almost completely denazified. The New World Order is suffering another tremendous defeat at the hands of Russia.
„Your teachers have sold you out. Your aunts, uncles and family doctor have sold you out. Their fear and stupidity has led them to throw your freedom, your health and your life under the bus. They surrendered the country and themselves and they surrendered you to the face of evil.”
If you’re a young person reading this, particularly a teen or preteen, I have sad news for you. Your parents, your grandparents and every other adult in your life all owe you an apology. They flushed the country–your country–down the toilet for no reason other than pure idiocy.
If anything has been made crystal clear over the last two years, it’s that stupidity and cowardice run deep in the American family. The so-called „greatest generation” had life handed to them on a silver platter, but that wasn’t enough for them. They wanted more. So they took their thirty pieces of silver and sold out their children, the baby boomers, who did the same to Generation X, who in turn sold out the Millennials, who have now sold you out.
Sure, those other generations had a great time when they were your age. They got drunk, got high and had all the sex they wanted. They lived high off the hog and never had to endure the problems you now face. In fact, as far as you and your problems are concerned, they couldn’t care less.
Ever heard of the French Revolution? Marie Antoinette allegedly responded to the plight of starving French peasants with the words, „Let them eat cake.” Your parents and the other adults in your life have responded to their betrayal of you with the words, „Let them get vaxxed.”
Your teachers have sold you out. Your aunts, uncles and family doctor have sold you out. Their fear and stupidity has led them to throw your freedom, your health and your life under the bus. They surrendered the country and themselves and they surrendered you to the face of evil. Don’t be shocked by any of this. It’s standard operating procedure in the adult world. It’s how adults have behaved all through history.
When I was growing up, my parents and the parents of everyone I knew had one overriding desire in life–to be seen as competent and successful by their peers. That was it; that was all they cared about–fitting in with the herd and not being socially ostracized. The most feared words in the English language to any of them were, „What will the neighbors think?”
The health, safety and wellbeing of their children meant nothing to any of them, only, „What will the neighbors think?”
Any kid who brought unfavorable comments or looks from the neighbors was beaten to a pulp.
This used to be called „keeping up with the Joneses.”
It consisted of imitating the behavior and beliefs of your peers, no matter how stupid, and of buying expensive cars and clothes you couldn’t afford. It was about doing whatever one could so as not to hear the dreaded words, „What will the neighbors think?”
Today is no different, only the words have changed. „Keeping up with the Joneses” is now known as „virtue signaling.”
The adults you see all around you are so concerned with what others think of them, so concerned with their status in the world and with virtue signaling to their neighbors that they refuse to step outside of the house without wearing a face diaper.
They are so fearful of being socially ostracized, they have willingly submitted to being injected with a dangerous and deadly „vaccine.” They have no idea what’s in the „vaccine” and they don’t care. Their only concern is being accepted by the herd and getting „likes” on social media.
In fact, they are so frightened of being seen as different that they will force you to take the same dangerous and deadly „vaccine.” After all, if you don’t take it, „What will the neighbors think?”
Perhaps your parents are different. Perhaps your parents haven’t surrendered their freedom, their dignity and their common sense to an imaginary virus. If so, thank God and then thank both of your parents. THE FUTURE
So what does your future hold, now that every adult in your life has turned traitor and sold you out?
Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be living in a state-owned and operated one room pod and eating bug paste for breakfast. You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy. You’ll have your parents to thank for it.
Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be tasked with serving the ruling elite. You’ll be a virtual slave to them in whatever capacity they demand.
Comply with your servitude and you might–just might–be given another slave as a mate. Refuse to participate and your punishment will be quick and deadly. You can thank your parents for it.
Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be subject to intense brainwashing and reeducation tactics in an attempt to destroy whatever spirituality you have left.
Resist and you have a chance of saving your eternal soul. Give in and you’ll be condemned to the fires of hell for all eternity. You can thank your parents for it.
“Freedom faces a new enemy. The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship. The new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence.”
…Under the leadership of Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization (UNO), which came into existence on October 24, 1945.
Since its inception, the United Nations and its branches, such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization (WHO), have prepared the countries of the world…[for] a world government…
The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome. In 1968, the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy. Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “The Limits to Growth.” The president emeritus of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the secretary of the club, General Bertrand Schneider, inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy, they listed pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check.
Since the 1990s, several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030.
The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015. It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The key concept is “sustainable development” that includes population control as a crucial instrument. Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors. Since the 1970s, the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse.
In the meanwhile, these anti-capitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media, the educational and judicial systems, and have become major players in the political arena. In many countries, particularly in Europe, the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system. Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system.
In 1945, [Julian] Huxley noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Huxley’s caution is no longer necessary. In the meantime, the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN sub-organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders. The WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)–whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO–have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order.
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945, it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom, because “laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems” have “created a great deal of ugliness” (p. 38). The time has come to work toward the emergence “of a single world culture” (p. 61). This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems.
CONCLUSION With the foundation of the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward. Together with the activities of the Club of Rome, they have stage to initiate the great reset that is going on currently.
With the pronouncement of a pandemic, the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society.
The covid hoax and Agenda 2030 are the culminationof a long-term Communist conspiracyrun by Organized Jewry and Freemasonry,and funded by the Rothschild banking cartel.They finagled our national credit cards and bought everyone and everything.
Their ultimate goalis to expand their control over our credit to a monopolyover literally everything, including thought and movement.
In retrospect, this Communist brainwashingmanual has proven very effective.
Communists are Satanists. Their goal is the destruction of Christian civilization and our total dispossession by turning reality on its head.
In short, stupid is smart, evil is good, unnatural is natural, ugly is beautiful, sick is healthy and falsehood is truth. They are re-engineering humanity as their slaves by first destroying the four legs of human identity: race, religion (God), nation (patriotism) and family (gender.)
The New World Order increasingly resembles a ’50’s Sci-Fi movie where the protagonist discovers his family and neighbors have been brainwashed and he begins to question his own sanity…
In the future, sanity will be based on your willingness to accept lying platitudes such as those peddled by Joe Biden and Anthony Fauci.
Those who expose the elite conspiracy are “right wing fanatics,” “anti Semites”, “hate mongers” and “conspiracy nuts.”
Now, I refer you to “The Soviet Art of Brainwashing,” a textbook that was used in Communist training schools both in the USA and Russia starting in the 1930’s.
Remember Communism was never a “working class revolt.” It was created by the Illuminati (Kabalistic bankers and British-American bluebloods) to control the common man and enact their one-world dictatorship.
The textbook suggests that we are currently the subjects of mass hypnosis which relies on trauma through the application of terror.
“In order to induce a high state of hypnosis in an individual, a group, or a population, an element of terror must always be present on the part of those who would govern.” (Part II, Ch.6)
But if we say so, we are “paranoid.”
“The by-word should be built into the society that paranoia is a condition “in which the individual believes he is being attacked by Communists.” It will be found that this defense is effective.” (II- Ch 10)
“The populace must be brought into the belief that every individual within it who rebels … against the efforts and activities to enslave the whole, must be considered to be a deranged person …and… be given electric shocks, and reduced into unimaginative docility for the remainder of his days.” (II-Ch.12)
THE ELITE ART OF BRAINWASHING (i.e. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION)
The textbook suggests that psycho political agents took control of the US in the first decades of the twentieth century.
“In the United States we have been able to alter the works of William James, and others, …and to place the tenets of Karl Marx, Pavlov, Lamarck, and the data of Dialectic Materialism into the textbooks of psychology, to such a degree that anyone thoroughly studying psychology becomes at once a candidate to accept the reasonableness of Communism.
“As every chair of psychology in the United States is occupied by persons in our connection, the consistent employment of such texts is guaranteed… Educating broadly the educated strata of the populace into the tenets of Communism is thus rendered relatively easy.” (II, Ch. 11)
The textbook calls these teachers “psycho political operatives” and their role is to brainwash the young. Most humanities and social science professors today are conscious agents, brainwashed dupes, or live in fear of the former.
Communists (elite Satanists) view man as (I quote) “a mechanism without individuality.” He is “basically an animal” with a “civilized veneer.” Like an animal, he can be forced to believe and do anything given the right combination of terror, deception, drugs and brute force.
The goal of “psycho politics” is to “produce the maximum chaos in the culture of the enemy,” and to “leave a nation leaderless.”
MORE ABOUT THE PSYCHO POLITICAL OPERATIVE
The textbook advocates the use of doctors, social workers, psychiatrists and the whole field of “mental healing” to bring about the Satanic goal.
Mental healers are not suppose to heal anyone, and are instructed to drive out competent people. This seems to apply to all doctors today.
“Mental health organizations must carefully delete from their ranks anyone actually proficient in the handling or treatment of mental health.” (II Ch. 9)
“The psycho political operative should also spare no expense in smashing out of existence, by whatever means, any actual healing group, such as that of acupuncture, in China; such as Christian Science, Dianetics and faith healing in the United States; such as Catholicism in Italy and Spain; and the practical psychological groups of England.” (II-9)
The textbook claims Communists took over the Freudian movement and the field of psychoanalysis, which has been “made fashionable,” and is useful because of its “stress on sex.” This serves the purposes of “degradation” and “defamation of character” i.e. blackmail. (II-9)
“Recruitment into the ranks of “mental healing” can best be done by carefully bringing to it only those healing students who are, to some slight degree, already depraved, or who have been “treated” by psycho political operatives. Recruitment is effected by making the field of mental healing very attractive, financially, and sexually.”
“The promise of unlimited sexual opportunities, the promise of complete dominion over the bodies and minds of helpless patients, the promise of having lawlessness without detection, can thus attract to “mental healing” many desirable recruits who will willingly fall in line with psycho political activities.” (II-13)
Alfred Kinsey is a prime example of the “psycho political operative.” In “The Kinsey Report” (1948) Kinsey influenced heterosexuals to adopt homosexual behaviour by pretending surveys said it was widespread. Hollywood celebrated him in a movie starring Liam Neeson. See also my “Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution”
OTHER PSYCHO POLITICAL OPERATIVES
Clearly “psycho political operatives” have infiltrated all institutions: military, religion, law, mass media, education and business. They have infiltrated all religions and political parties of every stripe. In the US, they are coordinated by the CFR, CIA , the Rockefeller network of Foundations, NGO’s, think tanks, professional associations and Freemasonry.
Here are some more instructions for these operatives:
“You must work until “religion” is synonymous with “insanity. You must work until the officials of city, county and state governments will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies.” (II-14)
“Movements to improve youth should be invaded and corrupted, as this might interrupt campaigns to produce in youth delinquency, addiction, drunkenness, and sexual promiscuity.” (II-15) Think boy scouts.
Seek out ” the leaders in the country’s future, and educate them into the belief of the animalistic nature of Man. This must be made fashionable. They must be taught to frown upon ideas, upon individual endeavour. They must be taught, above all things that the salvation of Man is to be found only by his adjusting thoroughly to this environment. …Nations, which have high ethical tone, are difficult to conquer. (II-8)
As you can see, the gradual degradation of Western society, the obsession with possessions, pleasure, sex (pornography), violence and trivia, is not random or commercial in nature. It is a deliberate preparation for destruction and tyranny.
Politicians are psycho political agents. Their job is to lie and manipulate, i.e. brainwash us. Their masters are a Satan worshipping cabal headed by Jacob Rothschild headquartered in the City of London. They literally own the mass media; what they don’t own they control through advertising.
This cabal represents a marriage (often literally) between Illuminati Jewish finance and Anglo American “aristocracy.” This cabal is behind Communism, Zionism, Nazism, Liberalism, Socialism, Freemasonry and Feminism.
These ‘isms play a part in undermining the four pillars of human identity and solidarity: nation, race, religion and family. You can add liberty and private property, which they also intend to abolish (i.e. confiscate.)
It’s all outlined in the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which calls for an “aristocracy of wealth.” This is not a “forgery” and to say so is not anti Semitic.
Jews have been duped like everyone else. Millions of basically good people are fooled by idealistic-sounding platitudes: “change the world,” “create social justice,” fight the “Patriarchy,” stop “anti Semitism”, defeat “superstition” and bring ” freedom.”
As Gandhi said, “the devil uses honest people to do his work.”
We can recognize the moral and natural order by the happiness and health of those who follow it. Only genuinely religious people and conservatives appear willing to defend it.
You cannot make a deal with the devil. His enticements are only designed to weaken. His intention is to enslave and destroy.
Civilization depends on the belief that truth is absolute and knowable. The New World Order dictatorship depends on convincing us that truth is whatever they say it is.
It’s no coincidence that Hollywood and the entertainment industry in general is dominated by Cabalist Jews and Freemasons.
We are brainwashed. Will we awake before it is too late? Are we already too craven and venal to act? (This was written in 2004)
Ten Biden whoppers: Afghanistan, COVID-19, national debt and the border
President Biden and his senior officials have left a lengthy trail of broken promises, false assurances and fibs
In just over eight months, President Joe Biden and his administration have been caught in a tangled web of broken promises, false assurances and fibs on a range of issues, including COVID-19, the southern border, the withdrawal from Afghanistan and the national debt. A short list of 10 of the most egregious examples follows:
1. No vaccine mandate:
Responding to a reporter’s question at a July White House press briefing regarding the federal government potentially issuing a vaccine mandate, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that it was “not the role of the federal government; that is the role that institutions, private-sector entities, and others may take.” Answering a previous question, Psaki said, “I don’t think our role is to place blame” on unvaccinated people for putting others at risk of getting COVID-19.
However, Biden issued a vaccine mandate in September, blaming unvaccinated people for the continuing pandemic. “This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” he said.
2. If vaccinated, then no masks required:
In May, Biden announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was “no longer recommending that fully vaccinated people need [to] wear masks.” However, when Psaki was asked in late July about vaccinated people having to mask up again, she said that the CDC was revising its guidance because of the Delta variant.
3. The southern border is closed:
In March, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said to migrants: “The message is quite clear: Do not come. The border is closed, the border is secure. We are expelling families, we are expelling single adults under the CDC’s authority under Title 42 of the United States Code because we are in the midst of a pandemic, and that is a public health imperative.
Despite this message, over a million illegal immigrants entered the U.S. from January to July, and more fentanyl has come into the country from October to June than all of the 2020 fiscal year.
In June, Vice President Kamala Harris blamed Trump’s immigration policies, including the “Remain in Mexico” policy, for the border crisis. However, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said that according to Border Patrol, the policy was effective and they warned the Biden administration of the problems rescinding the policy would cause.
4. Border Patrol whipped a Haitian migrant:
Following the release of photos and video of Border Patrol agents in Del Rio, Texas on horseback keeping Haitian migrants from crossing the border and using reins to keep them at a safe distance from the horses, a reporter said in a White House press briefing that the agents were “seemingly using whips.” Psaki said the footage was “horrible to watch” and she couldn’t “imagine what the scenario is where that would be appropriate.” She added, “Of course, they should never be able to do it again.”
The day after the briefing, president of the National Border Patrol Council, Brandon Judd, criticized Psaki’s statements on the John Solomon Reports podcast, saying that the White House prejudged the situation. He explained that twirling the reins “is a legitimate law enforcement action” that keeps illegal immigrants away from the horses so they don’t get hurt.
“Nobody was hit by those reins; they are not whips,” Judd said. He added that the Biden administration had approved of “using the reins, to keep people away from the horses for their own protection.”
White House and media accounts of the situation were “factually wrong, yes,” he said. “And the White House knows that they’re factually wrong.”
The photographer who took the pictures of the agents that went viral said that he had “never seen” the agents “whip anyone.” He added that a picture of an agent who was swinging a rope or rein could “be misconstrued when you’re looking at the picture.”
Three days after Psaki’s comments, the Biden administration banned Border Patrol agents from using horses in Del Rio.
5. Trump didn’t leave a plan for Afghanistan withdrawal:
Secretary of State Antony Blinken told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the Trump administration didn’t leave behind a plan for withdrawing from Afghanistan. “We inherited a deadline, we did not inherit a plan,” he said.
Kash Patel, who served on the Trump transition coordination team and as chief of staff to acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, told the John Solomon Reports podcast that what Blinken said was untrue.
“We actually did not leave them a deadline,” he said. “It was a negotiation between the U.S. government, the Taliban, and the Afghans. And if that date was not to work for this incoming administration, they could have moved it. But what they chose to do was break the entire agreement.”
Patel detailed a few main components of the complex plan that Trump left for his successor, including getting Americans out of Afghanistan before abandoning Bagram Air Base.
6. Taliban won’t take power in Afghanistan quickly:
For months, the Biden administration assured Congress that Afghan government forces would be able to hold off the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal. In July, Biden told reporters that it was not inevitable that Afghanistan would fall to the Taliban because there were more Afghan forces and they were “better trained, better equipped, and more competent in terms of conducting war.”
Contrary to administration assurances, however, the terrorist organization rapidly swept to power in Afghanistan before American troops had even completed their withdrawal.
7. Military advisers didn’t recommend leaving a force behind in Afghanistan:
In an Aug.18 interview on ABC, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden whether his military advisers had told him the U.S. “should just keep 2,500 troops” in-country beyond the withdrawal deadline to preserve what had been “a stable situation for the last several years.”
“No,” Biden replied. “No one said that to me that I can recall.”
However, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, and commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. Kenneth McKenzie all told the Senate Committee on Armed Services this week that they had advised Biden to keep 2,500 troops in Afghanistan, based on the advice of Army Gen. Scott Miller, the last commander to lead U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.
8. Al Qaeda is gone from Afghanistan:
On Aug. 20, Biden told a reporter: “We went to Afghanistan for the express purpose of getting rid of al Qaeda in Afghanistan, as well as getting Osama bin Laden. And we did.”
However, that same day, Pentagon Press Secretary Jack Kirby said: “We know that Al-Qaeda is a presence, as well as ISIS, in Afghanistan and we’ve talked about that for quite some time. We do not believe it is exorbitantly high but we don’t have an exact figure for you.”
9. $3.5 trillion spending package costs $0, won’t add to national debt:
“My Build Back Better Agenda costs zero dollars,” a post on Biden’s Twitter account reads. “Instead of wasting money on tax breaks, loopholes, and tax evasion for big corporations and the wealthy, we can make a once-in-a-generation investment in working America. And it adds zero dollars to the national debt.”
The Biden administration claims that tax increases will offset the cost of the bill.
However, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated the $3.5 trillion bill could actually cost up to $5.5 trillion over 10 years.
David Ditch, a federal spending and fiscal policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, said: “The $3.5 trillion in spending and tax credits combined with at least $2 trillion in tax hikes will add to the debt and have a tremendous cost to the economy and to the health of American families. The taxes will hit families taking home as little as $30,000 per year, violating President Biden’s promise.”
10. “Righteous” drone strike:
Milley initially called a drone strike that was intended to target ISIS-K terrorists “righteous.”
“At this point, we think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was a righteous strike,” he told reporters.
After investigating the strike, the military found that 10 civilians were actually killed in the drone strike, most of whom were children.
(No surprise that the Vatican has gone over to Satanism)
Matt 6 21 “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”
I am a great supporter of the traditional Catholic church but I was not awarethat the Vatican is second only to the Rothschilds in worldly wealth.
This is the Catholic Church I know and love:Pope Leo XIII (Pope 1878-1903) on Freemasonry
Francis is a Freemason, a Satanist and an Imposter
The Zionist Luciferian Jewish Rothschilds took over all the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823 and purchased Jerusalem in 1829.
Today the large banking and financial business of the Catholic Church is an extensive system interlocked with the Rothschilds and the rest of the International Banking system Rothschilds control in addition to their own fortune (estimated at over half of the wealth of the entire world.) The immense liquid resource of the Catholic Church is second only to the Rothschilds’ in wealth and power.
“The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others.
“The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations such as Gulf Oil, Shell, General Motors, Bethlehem Steel, General Electric, International Business Machines, T.W.A., etc.” (…)
“In a statement published in connection with a bond prospectus, the Boston archdiocese listed its assets at Six Hundred and Thirty-five Million ($635,891,004), which is 9.9 times its liabilities. This leaves a net worth of Five Hundred and Seventy-one million dollars ($571,704,953). It is not difficult to discover the truly astonishing wealth of the church, once we add the riches of the twenty-eight archdioceses and 122 dioceses of the U.S.A., some of which are even wealthier than that of Boston.
“Some idea of the real estate and other forms of wealth controlled by the Catholic church may be gathered by the remark of a member of the New York Catholic Conference, namely ‘that his church probably ranks second only to the United States Government in total annual purchase.’
“Another statement, made by a nationally syndicated Catholic priest, perhaps is even more telling. ‘The Catholic church,’ he said, ‘must be the biggest corporation in the United States. We have a branch office in every neighborhood. Our assets and real estate holdings must exceed those of Standard Oil, A.T.&T., and U.S. Steel combined. And our roster of dues-paying members must be second only to the tax rolls of the United States Government.'”
(…) “The Catholic church, once all her assets have been put together, is the most formidable stockbroker in the world. The Vatican, independently of each successive pope, has been increasingly orientated towards the U.S. The Wall Street Journal said that the Vatican’s financial deals in the U.S. alone were so big that very often it sold or bought gold in lots of a million or more dollars at one time.” (…)
“The Vatican’s treasure of solid gold has been estimated by the United Nations World Magazine to amount to several billion dollars. A large bulk of this is stored in gold ingots with the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, while banks in England and Switzerland hold the rest. “But this is just a small portion of the wealth of the Vatican, which in the U.S. alone, is greater than that of the five wealthiest giant corporations of the country. When to that is added all the real estate, property, stocks and shares abroad, then the staggering accumulation of the wealth of the Catholic church becomes so formidable as to defy any rational assessment.”
In a surreptitious move to support the vaccine narrative, the CDC quietly changed the over 20-year definition of a vaccine, so it no longer says that vaccines produce immunity
The World Health Organization changed the definition of a pandemic, so it no longer says there are “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses,” only that there is a new virus without known human immunity
Health experts are pushing the vaccine program based on the promise of herd immunity. However, the NIAID has said that you can have breakthrough infections and spread those infections to others
The WHO defines herd immunity from vaccines as those that protect you from getting the disease and passing it on. This means by the WHO definition the shots will never provide herd immunity; how long will it take for the WHO to change the definition again?
CDC Changes the Definition of Vaccines
In a surreptitious move to support the vaccine narrative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly changed the definition of a vaccine,1,2 which they have held since at least February 24, 2011.3 At first glance, it might seem like a small change, but it has massive repercussions.
The meaning of words can change over time, and can be influenced by social, economic, political, religious and technological factors. Many of the words we use today have vastly different meanings than they did 10 or 100 years ago.4 However, changing medical words and definitions has a significant impact on bias in perception. One study demonstrated that a simple switch in terminology could result:5
“… in a disease being perceived as more serious, more likely to be a disease, and more likely to be a rare condition. These findings regarding the conceptualization of disease have implications for many areas, including medical communication with the public, advertising, and public policy.”
For example, medical literature has redefined the meaning of “health” over several decades to move from the absence of disease to a state of well-being. That definition continues to evolve in light of value-based health care, which some recommend should now include “specific patient needs, and the organizational, value-based system required to satisfy those needs.”6
This change in definition then affects health care delivery, public perception and interpretation of the meaning of health. This strategy was not lost on the CDC when they removed critical words from the definition of a “vaccine” to change the public perception of any administered therapy that may impact a person’s immune system.
This opens the door to the administration of other “products” or “preparations” that may affect your immune system, still while calling it a vaccine. And, let’s face it, for much of the public, the word “vaccine” continues to have positive implications.
CDC Removes Critical Words From Vaccine Definition
To fully understand the importance of the change, it’s crucial to note that, before the COVID pandemic, the definition of a vaccine had been relatively stable for nearly a couple decades with minor word changes occurring every few years. All through that time the intent of a vaccine — to give you immunity by protecting you from a specific disease — had remained basically the same.
For example, according to an archived snapshot of the CDC’s website, the definition of a vaccine February 24, 2011, was:7
“A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.”
By July 2015, the wording had changed to:8
“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed in the nose.”
The wording was the same in June 20179 and likewise in June 201910 and June 2020.11 By August 26, 2021,12 however, the definition had changed slightly to add the words “to produce immunity”:13
“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
Then, less than a week later, just days after the FDA gave final approval to Pfizer’s mRNA jab, the definition changed again, September 1, 2021 — this time, significantly. The definition of a vaccine now reads:14
“A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
As you’ll note, the second sentence remains the same. It is the first part of the definition that has dramatically changed. In the latest definition, a vaccine:
Is no longer a “product” but instead is a “preparation”
No longer directly stimulates the immune response, but is used to stimulate the system
Does not produce immunity
Stimulates the immune response against diseases, not against a specific disease
No longer protects a person from the disease
These dramatic changes were likely created to allow the CDC, FDA and other governmental agencies to call the genetic therapy experiment being administered worldwide a “vaccine” — while they knew full well the so-called “vaccine” was not created to either produce immunity or prevent transmission of disease. In fact, by any definition of a vaccine in use before 2021, this jab is not a vaccine.
Organizations Are Changing the Goal Posts
Alex Berenson was once a reporter for The New York Times and is now an award-winning author. He published a timeline of events on a Substack page that he calls “A Lawsuit in Three Acts.”15 In Act I is an August 26, 2021, screenshot of the CDC website, with the prior definition of a vaccine as you can see above. Act II is a screenshot of a tweet Berenson posted August 28, 2021:
“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.”
Following the release of that tweet, Twitter ruled the information misleading and suspended his account16 for “violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules.”17 As Berenson writes, “This defamatory act prevents me from using my account anywhere in the world.”18
Within days of Berenson’s ban, Act III occurred. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine, removing the standard that had been in place for at least 20 years that vaccines produce immunity. In his last comment, Berenson alludes to the acts of censorship that have been ongoing in social media platforms since the beginning of this pandemic, writing, “Discovery’s gonna be awesome!”19
September 8, 2021, one of Berenson’s followers, Carol Jones, commented, “LOL!!! My lawyer husband just laughed when he read this. That is a slam dunk.” As a side note, Merriam-Webster Dictionary’s definition of a vaccine once was:20
“… a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”
However, before the CDC changed its definition, Merriam-Webster had already changed theirs, which now includes a secondary description of the experimental COVID-19 genetic therapy.21 Interestingly, when they made the change, the definition evolved from a simple, single line to a much more complex 12-paragraph definition that is a reflection of the times we live in.
The movement toward changing the definition of a vaccine may help protect the pharmaceutical industry and health agencies from violating a Federal Trade Commission act that regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. According to this it is unlawful to say:22
“… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”
And further, you cannot have a vaccine that does not meet the definition of a vaccine. Currently, the COVID-19 genetic therapy injection program does meet the vaccine definition of the CDC and Merriam-Webster — but only after the definitions changed.
What Is a Pandemic?
The definition of a vaccine is not the only thing that has changed since 2020. To continue promoting mandates, lockdowns and emergency use authorization of genetic therapy injections, the infection must be causing a pandemic.
According to the World Health Organization, their original definition of a pandemic specified that there must be simultaneous epidemics experienced worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses.”23
While the published documents with the definition of a pandemic have since been pulled offline and cannot be accessed any longer through the Wayback machine, the WHO published a paper refuting the allegations that they had changed the definition “for the simple reason that it has never formally defined pandemic influenza.”24
They argued that while they had described a pandemic influenza, it was never a “formal definition.” In their explanation they say that since 2003 their pandemic preparedness page had contained this statement:25
“An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
They claim that was changed in response to a query from a CNN reporter just weeks before they declared a swine flu pandemic after only 144 people died from the infection worldwide. The new statement removed the phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” and was revised to:26 “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.”
The Council of Europe apparently had the same question and cited this alteration in their page as evidence that the WHO could declare a pandemic without demonstrating the severity of the disease against which we didn’t have immunity.27
Unfortunately, the number of excess deaths that can be attributed directly to COVID-19 is likely not be the result of the infection itself, but from the CDC’s and NIAID’s suppression of successful treatment modalities that can save lives.28,29,30,31,32
Vaccine Sales Pitch: Herd Immunity
Health experts promote the idea of herd immunity, hoping 100% of the public will become vaccinated. However, in July 2021 the news reported that 100 fully vaccinated crew members aboard the British defense aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth had tested positive while onboard. At the time, it was unclear whether any had symptoms.33
This was one of the first reports that vaccinated individuals could have breakthrough infections, aka, “vaccine failure.” Vaccine failure would indicate that herd immunity is impossible. But, of course, that depends on your definition of herd immunity.
In June 2020, WHOs definition was posted on their COVID-19 Q&A page and was in line with widely accepted standards for infectious diseases. Courtesy of the Wayback machine, the original definition was:34
“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”
Since humans have been alive, immunity has developed from previous infection. Your immune system is designed to work in response to exposure to an infectious agent, not to a vaccine. However, since October 15, 2020, the WHO believes this is no longer the case, as they updated their definition of herd immunity to a “concept used for vaccination” or, rather, to support vaccination:35
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission.”
The page was again updated on December 31, 2020:36
“’Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination …
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission.
To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”
As you can see from the areas I put in boldface in the two definitions above, the WHO definition of a vaccine and the CDC definition are not congruent. In this statement, the WHO says that vaccines protect the individual from getting the disease or passing on the pathogen. The current CDC definition37 says that vaccines merely “stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” without mention of immunity, protection or passing pathogens.
This means the definition of a vaccine by the WHO does not cover the function of the COVID-19 genetic therapy program, since the mRNA gene therapy’s purpose is only to lessen symptoms. The NIAID admits that after the mRNA shots people can still get breakthrough infections38 (so they aren’t protected from getting the disease) and will have enough pathogens in their nasal cavity to spread the disease39 (they are passing on the pathogen).
Even with the changes the WHO made to their definition of herd immunity, it is apparent that the COVID-19 injection program will never meet the standards of herd immunity set by the WHO. The only question is how long will it take the WHO to change their definition again?
Living in a World Where Goal Posts Are Constantly Changing
In this short video, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, gives an accounting of Dr. Anthony Fauci vacillating on his recommendations regarding masking in public. Fauci was appointed as the director of the NIAID in 1984 which, by 2020, should have made him an expert on the transmission of infectious diseases.
Yet, as is apparent by this historical recounting, the recommendations evolve depending on the current climate, just as the definitions of herd immunity, vaccines and pandemics have evolved.
These definitions have been changed to fit the new narrative being churned out by public health officials and mainstream media that promote fear and ignore science. In many ways, you’re living in a fog of war right now — a fog of COVID war — according to Jeffrey Tucker, editorial director of the American Institute for Economic Research.40
During such a fog, “It is often unclear who is making decisions and why, and what the relationships are between the strategies and the goals. Even the rationale can become elusive as frustration and disorientation displace clarity and rationality.”41 Seeing through the fog is the first step to coming out of the battle unscathed.
I would encourage you to copy the content from this article and save it to your hard drive so you can share this information and help others see through this fog of misinformation and lies that is threatening our way of life.
COVIDMandates Wreak Havoc on Healthcare System, Workforce
Draconian COVID policies and vaccine mandates are creating an uncertain future for a health care system that was already on shaky ground even before the terrible COVID policies took hold.
In January 2020 — pre-COVID — the Commonwealth Fund published a sobering report on the state of U.S. healthcare, comparing the U.S. to other high-income countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
The report shared a number of depressing findings. First, despite the U.S. spending twice as much on healthcare (as a share of the economy) as comparable wealthy nations, Americans have the lowest life expectancy and highest suicide rates. Nor is America’s poor bang for its healthcare buck anything sudden or new — a 30-year-old study that compared the U.S. to 15 OECD nations reached the same conclusions.
The Commonwealth Fund report also drew attention to the fact that, among peer nations, the U.S. has the highest chronic disease burden, the highest number of hospitalizations from “preventable causes” and the highest rate of “avoidable deaths.”
Restrictive COVID policies have worsened these health indicators, with mounting deaths of despair and a plummeting life expectancy that researchers predict will drop still further.
The draconian policies — and especially COVID vaccine mandates for healthcare workers (HCWs) — are also wreaking havoc on the U.S. healthcare system and health workforce. Astoundingly high percentages of HCWs have experienced adverse events after accepting the jabs, rendering some unfit for duty. And among HCWs who, having done their due diligence, have chosen to decline the injections, firings and resignations are growing increasingly commonplace. These kinds of handicaps portend an uncertain future for a healthcare system that was already on shaky ground even before the terrible COVID policies took hold.
Early guinea pigs
As soon as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted Emergency Use Authorization for the COVID vaccines, HCWs began to find themselves in a catch-22: take an experimental injection (made by felonious pharma giants exempt from legal liability for injuries) or — egged on by hostile parties that now include no less than POTUS himself — risk ostracism or worse.
Many HCWs who dutifully did what they were told have not fared well. An online survey of 1,245 HCWs published in April (“representing various parts of the country during the early phase of COVID-19 vaccination”) furnishes one particularly hair-raising glimpse of the potential risks — for both provider and patient.
The study focused on roughly 800 HCWs (46% younger than age 41 and nearly all with doctoral, medical or Master’s degrees) who received the Pfizer vaccine and reported one or more symptoms. Almost all (93%) had received two doses.
Post-vaccination, about one in eight HCWs “temporarily” had trouble performing activities of daily living. In addition, the survey results highlighted the following:
Symptoms such as fatigue, headache, joint pain, nausea, muscle spasm, sweating, dizziness, flushing, brain fog, anorexia, sleep disruptions, tingling and palpitations were common.
Grouped by organ system, large percentages of the Pfizer-injected HCWs reported symptoms that were “generalized” (76%) or musculoskeletal (53%). However, the injections also displayed the capacity to affect nearly every body system: gastrointestinal (21%), psychological/psychiatric (17%), neurological (13%), otolaryngological (12%), endocrine (10%), cardiovascular (6%), respiratory (3%), urinary (1%) and allergic (1%).
The principal neurological symptom reported was brain fog or “reduced mental clarity” — a disabling symptom that can scarcely be reassuring to the affected individuals’ patients. This category also included reports of symptoms such as numbness, paralysis, vertigo and reactivation of herpes or shingles. These types of neurological symptoms are no joke; some HCWs have reported being denied health insurance and Workers’ Compensation despite symptoms so debilitating that they can no longer work.
In the otolarnygological category, ear and eye symptoms predominated, included ear ringing, changes in hearing, ear/eye pain, blurred vision and “flashing lights.” The vision-related symptoms dovetail with data from the European drug monitoring agency, which has recorded tens of thousands of eye disorders following COVID vaccination.
Oddly, 6% of Pfizer recipients reported upbeat feelings of joy, relief or gratitude in response to receiving the injections. The researchers characterized this as a “positive sign” of HCW willingness to “[take] the challenge to end the deadly pandemic, irrespective of side effects experienced.”
In early 2021, Czech researchers conducted a nearly identical HCW survey. Virtually all of the respondents (n=818), about a third of whom had at least one chronic illness at baseline, received two doses of the Pfizer shot, and 93% of the latter reported one or more side effects. Disturbingly, the prevalence of adverse reactions was consistently higher in younger (< 43 years old) HCWs with more of their careers ahead of them. Almost one in ten Pfizer recipients reported symptoms lasting for a week or more. Nevertheless, the researchers gaily concluded that healthcare workers and students “are among the ideal population groups to participate in this type of studies [sic] due to their high level of health literacy and scientific motivation.”
From the beginning of the COVID vaccines’ rollout, surveys have indicated that HCWs are “somewhat more skeptical [about COVID vaccine safety] compared to the general public.” In early January, one in four surveyed HCWs indicated that they had no plans to ever get a COVID shot, with “wariness of going first” being one of the commonly cited reasons. In many healthcare settings, far larger proportions than 25% have chosen to remain unvaccinated.
In an opinion piece that appeared in HuffPost in February, senior reporter Jeffrey Young patronizingly explained that HCWs have “complicated” reasons for rejecting COVID shots, but he kindly suggested that those reasons do not make them “conspiracy theorists.” Somewhat more aptly, Young stated that HCWs “have watched the government bungle so many aspects of the COVID-19 response that when those same authority figures tell them to get vaccinated first, essentially to be guinea pigs for new vaccines, their messages aren’t always well-received.”
Months later, HCWs have had numerous opportunities to observe first-hand the post-jab travails of injected colleagues and patients, and for many, this has only intensified their “wariness.” In late August, two thousand HCWs filed a lawsuit in the state of Maine to block COVID vaccine mandates, arguing their wish “to be able to continue to provide the healthcare they have provided to patients for their entire careers, and to do so under the same protective measures that have sufficed for them to be considered superheroes for the last 18 months.”
The administration of Maine Governor Janet Mills is requiring that all HCWs in the state be vaccinated by Oct. 1. Outgoing New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a similar HCW vaccine mandate in August, stating that HCWs would be required to get a first dose even sooner (by Sept. 27), but on Sept. 14, District Judge David Hurd granted a temporary restraining order suspending the mandate because the state unlawfully disallowed religious exemptions available under federal law and the Constitution.
States imposing top-down HCW mandates may need to brace for some heavy fallout. The U.S. is already in the midst of an unprecedented nursing shortage, and as the mandates drive out even more of the best and brightest, the situation promises to get worse. Healthcare analysts point out that shortages of skilled nurses have major implications for patient care, with consequences ranging from longer wait times (and shorter visits), to less available care in rural settings to a higher risk of medication errors and even patient deaths.
The U.S. is also facing a shortfall of doctors. The pre-COVID Commonwealth Fund report — which found that Americans, even though sicker than their healthier counterparts in other wealthy nations, go to the doctor less often — suggested that physician shortages could be a contributing factor.
Get your care now
With an eye on the vaccine-mandate-impelled nursing shortage, former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson advised in August, “if you need to get sick, do it before the mandates hit Oct. 1.”
Though Berenson’s warning may have been somewhat tongue in cheek, a New York hospital announced earlier this month that it would be putting maternity services on hold after Sept. 24 due to resignations from maternity staff opposed to the mandates. In addition to stating that “The number of resignations received leaves…no choice but to pause delivering babies,” the hospital’s CEO indicated that services in five other units could be “curtailed in some way” if more hospital staff end up choosing departure over vaccination.
While noting that 70% of the resignations thus far have been from staff working in crucial clinical positions, the hospital CEO maintained that he was “unequivocally” in favor of mandatory vaccination.
The pausing of maternity services may inconvenience pregnant women with late September due dates, but the clinical staff fleeing heavy-handed mandates can hardly be blamed for objecting to the Hobbesian choice between risks to life and livelihood. As Children’s Health Defense president Mary Holland forcefully reiterated in response to President Biden’s inflammatory demonization of the unvaccinated, “The Nuremberg Code, which the U.S. promulgated and has expanded over time, says it best: ‘The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.’”
What is the end game?
Kaiser Family Foundation characterizes the healthcare workforce impacts of COVID vaccine mandates as “unintended consequences,” but one has to wonder whether the medical and political establishment could truly be blind to the fact that so many “health-literate” HCWs would choose to decline the injections.
Many strangely “counter intuitive” episodes have transpired within the health system over the past 18 months, including widespread and dramatic health workforce layoffs and facility closures early last year, at precisely the same time that the media were trumpeting the emergency and celebrating HCWs for their heroism in the COVID trenches.
With COVID-19 clearly serving as the pretext to orchestrate a vast and governance in favor of more centralization and surveillance, it stands to reason that the medical-pharmaceutical cartel may be seizing the opportunity to catalyze similar health system changes. The departure of seasoned HCWs accustomed to providing competent in-person care could, in fact, facilitate the desired push for more virtual healthcare and telemedicine, a CDC-encouraged trend that will send far more patient data into the waiting hands of cloud services providers like Amazon and Microsoft.
For people who desire face-to-face care, and for ethical healthcare workers whose gift is to provide that type of care, it may be time to come up with a new model, one that perhaps emphasizes old-fashioned prevention — good nutrition and plenty of sunlight and exercise — over newfangled, gene-modifying injections that thus far have proven more effective at lining pockets than in doing anything useful for health.