An Urgent Message to the Young „Your teachers have sold you out. Your aunts, uncles and family doctor have sold you out. Their fear and stupidity has led them to throw your freedom, your health and your life under the bus”.

Your teachers have sold you out. Your aunts, uncles and family doctor have sold you out. Their fear and stupidity has led them to throw your freedom, your health and your life under the bus. They surrendered the country and themselves and they surrendered you to the face of evil.”

If you’re a young person reading this, particularly a teen or preteen, I have sad news for you. Your parents, your grandparents and every other adult in your life all owe you an apology. They flushed the country–your country–down the toilet for no reason other than pure idiocy.

If anything has been made crystal clear over the last two years, it’s that stupidity and cowardice run deep in the American family. The so-called „greatest generation” had life handed to them on a silver platter, but that wasn’t enough for them. They wanted more. So they took their thirty pieces of silver and sold out their children, the baby boomers, who did the same to Generation X, who in turn sold out the Millennials, who have now sold you out.

Sure, those other generations had a great time when they were your age. They got drunk, got high and had all the sex they wanted. They lived high off the hog and never had to endure the problems you now face. In fact, as far as you and your problems are concerned, they couldn’t care less.

Ever heard of the French Revolution? Marie Antoinette allegedly responded to the plight of starving French peasants with the words, „Let them eat cake.”
Your parents and the other adults in your life have responded to their betrayal of you with the words, „Let them get vaxxed.”

Your teachers have sold you out. Your aunts, uncles and family doctor have sold you out. Their fear and stupidity has led them to throw your freedom, your health and your life under the bus. They surrendered the country and themselves and they surrendered you to the face of evil.
Don’t be shocked by any of this. It’s standard operating procedure in the adult world. It’s how adults have behaved all through history.

lives-destroyed.jpgWhen I was growing up, my parents and the parents of everyone I knew had one overriding desire in life–to be seen as competent and successful by their peers. That was it; that was all they cared about–fitting in with the herd and not being socially ostracized. The most feared words in the English language to any of them were, „What will the neighbors think?”

The health, safety and wellbeing of their children meant nothing to any of them, only, „What will the neighbors think?”

Any kid who brought unfavorable comments or looks from the neighbors was beaten to a pulp.

This used to be called „keeping up with the Joneses.”

It consisted of imitating the behavior and beliefs of your peers, no matter how stupid, and of buying expensive cars and clothes you couldn’t afford. It was about doing whatever one could so as not to hear the dreaded words, „What will the neighbors think?”

Today is no different, only the words have changed. „Keeping up with the Joneses” is now known as „virtue signaling.”

The adults you see all around you are so concerned with what others think of them, so concerned with their status in the world and with virtue signaling to their neighbors that they refuse to step outside of the house without wearing a face diaper.

They are so fearful of being socially ostracized, they have willingly submitted to being injected with a dangerous and deadly „vaccine.” They have no idea what’s in the „vaccine” and they don’t care. Their only concern is being accepted by the herd and getting „likes” on social media.

In fact, they are so frightened of being seen as different that they will force you to take the same dangerous and deadly „vaccine.” After all, if you don’t take it, „What will the neighbors think?”

Perhaps your parents are different. Perhaps your parents haven’t surrendered their freedom, their dignity and their common sense to an imaginary virus. If so, thank God and then thank both of your parents.
crippled.jpgTHE FUTURE

So what does your future hold, now that every adult in your life has turned traitor and sold you out?

Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be living in a state-owned and operated one room pod and eating bug paste for breakfast. You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy. You’ll have your parents to thank for it.

Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be tasked with serving the ruling elite. You’ll be a virtual slave to them in whatever capacity they demand.

Comply with your servitude and you might–just might–be given another slave as a mate. Refuse to participate and your punishment will be quick and deadly. You can thank your parents for it.

Soon–and it’s only if you survive the jab that’s killing and crippling hundreds of thousands of people–you’ll be subject to intense brainwashing and reeducation tactics in an attempt to destroy whatever spirituality you have left.

Resist and you have a chance of saving your eternal soul. Give in and you’ll be condemned to the fires of hell for all eternity. You can thank your parents for it.

Ain’t life grand?

The United Nations & the Origins of “The Great Reset”

“Freedom faces a new enemy. The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship. The new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence.”

…Under the leadership of Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization (UNO), which came into existence on October 24, 1945.

Since its inception, the United Nations and its branches, such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization (WHO), have prepared the countries of the world…[for] a world government…

The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome. In 1968, the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy. Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “The Limits to Growth.”
The president emeritus of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the secretary of the club, General Bertrand Schneider, inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy, they listed pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check.

Since the 1990s, several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030.

The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015. It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The key concept is “sustainable development” that includes population control as a crucial instrument.
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors. Since the 1970s, the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse.

In the meanwhile, these anti-capitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media, the educational and judicial systems, and have become major players in the political arena.
In many countries, particularly in Europe, the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system. Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system.

julian-h.pngIn 1945, [Julian] Huxley noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

Huxley’s caution is no longer necessary. In the meantime, the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN sub-organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders. The WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)–whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO–have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order.

As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945, it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom, because “laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems” have “created a great deal of ugliness” (p. 38). The time has come to work toward the emergence “of a single world culture” (p. 61). This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems.

CONCLUSION
With the foundation of the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward. Together with the activities of the Club of Rome, they have stage to initiate the great reset that is going on currently.

With the pronouncement of a pandemic, the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society.

1930’s Soviet Brainwashing Manual Explains Today- The covid hoax and Agenda 2030 are the culmination of a long-term Communist conspiracy run by Organized Jewry and Freemasonry, and funded by the Rothschild banking cartel.

The covid hoax and Agenda 2030 are the culmination of a long-term Communist conspiracy run by Organized Jewry and Freemasonry, and funded by the Rothschild banking cartel. They finagled our national credit cards and  bought everyone and everything. 

Their ultimate goal is to expand their control over our credit to a monopoly over literally everything, including thought and movement.

In retrospect, this Communist brainwashing manual has proven very effective.

Communists are Satanists. Their goal is the destruction of Christian civilization and our total dispossession by turning reality on its head.

In short, stupid is smart, evil is good, unnatural is natural, ugly is beautiful, sick is healthy and falsehood is truth. They are re-engineering humanity as their slaves by first destroying the four legs of human identity: race, religion (God), nation (patriotism) and family (gender.)

The New World Order increasingly resembles a ’50’s Sci-Fi movie where the protagonist discovers his family and neighbors have been brainwashed and he begins to question his own sanity…

In the future, sanity will be based on your willingness to accept lying platitudes such as those peddled by Joe Biden and Anthony Fauci.

 Those who expose the elite conspiracy are “right wing fanatics,” “anti Semites”, “hate mongers” and “conspiracy nuts.”

Now, I refer you to “The Soviet Art of Brainwashing,” a textbook that was used in Communist training schools both in the USA and Russia starting in the 1930’s.

Remember Communism was never a “working class revolt.” It was created by the Illuminati (Kabalistic bankers and British-American bluebloods) to control the common man and enact their one-world dictatorship.

The textbook suggests that we are currently the subjects of mass hypnosis which relies on trauma through the application of terror.

“In order to induce a high state of hypnosis in an individual, a group, or a population, an element of terror must always be present on the part of those who would govern.” (Part II, Ch.6)

But if we say so, we are “paranoid.”

“The by-word should be built into the society that paranoia is a condition “in which the individual believes he is being attacked by Communists.” It will be found that this defense is effective.” (II- Ch 10)

“The populace must be brought into the belief that every individual within it who rebels … against the efforts and activities to enslave the whole, must be considered to be a deranged person …and… be given electric shocks, and reduced into unimaginative docility for the remainder of his days.” (II-Ch.12)


bez-edu.png

THE ELITE ART OF BRAINWASHING (i.e. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION)

The textbook suggests that psycho political agents took control of the US in the first decades of the twentieth century.

“In the United States we have been able to alter the works of William James, and others, …and to place the tenets of Karl Marx, Pavlov, Lamarck, and the data of Dialectic Materialism into the textbooks of psychology, to such a degree that anyone thoroughly studying psychology becomes at once a candidate to accept the reasonableness of Communism.

“As every chair of psychology in the United States is occupied by persons in our connection, the consistent employment of such texts is guaranteed… Educating broadly the educated strata of the populace into the tenets of Communism is thus rendered relatively easy.” (II, Ch. 11)

The textbook calls these teachers “psycho political operatives” and their role is to brainwash the young. Most humanities and social science professors today are conscious agents, brainwashed dupes, or live in fear of the former.

Communists (elite Satanists) view man as (I quote) “a mechanism without individuality.” He is “basically an animal” with a “civilized veneer.” Like an animal, he can be forced to believe and do anything given the right combination of terror, deception, drugs and brute force.

The goal of “psycho politics” is to “produce the maximum chaos in the culture of the enemy,” and to “leave a nation leaderless.”


MORE ABOUT THE PSYCHO POLITICAL OPERATIVE

The textbook advocates the use of doctors, social workers, psychiatrists and the whole field of “mental healing” to bring about the Satanic goal.

Mental healers are not suppose to heal anyone, and are instructed to drive out competent people. This seems to apply to all doctors today.

“Mental health organizations must carefully delete from their ranks anyone actually proficient in the handling or treatment of mental health.” (II Ch. 9)

“The psycho political operative should also spare no expense in smashing out of existence, by whatever means, any actual healing group, such as that of acupuncture, in China; such as Christian Science, Dianetics and faith healing in the United States; such as Catholicism in Italy and Spain; and the practical psychological groups of England.” (II-9)

The textbook claims Communists took over the Freudian movement and the field of psychoanalysis, which has been “made fashionable,” and is useful because of its “stress on sex.” This serves the purposes of “degradation” and “defamation of character” i.e. blackmail. (II-9)

“Recruitment into the ranks of “mental healing” can best be done by carefully bringing to it only those healing students who are, to some slight degree, already depraved, or who have been “treated” by psycho political operatives. Recruitment is effected by making the field of mental healing very attractive, financially, and sexually.”

“The promise of unlimited sexual opportunities, the promise of complete dominion over the bodies and minds of helpless patients, the promise of having lawlessness without detection, can thus attract to “mental healing” many desirable recruits who will willingly fall in line with psycho political activities.” (II-13)

Alfred Kinsey is a prime example of the “psycho political operative.” In “The Kinsey Report” (1948) Kinsey influenced heterosexuals to adopt homosexual behaviour by pretending surveys said it was widespread. Hollywood celebrated him in a movie starring Liam Neeson. See also my “Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution”

bezmenov-sub.png

OTHER PSYCHO POLITICAL OPERATIVES

Clearly “psycho political operatives” have infiltrated all institutions: military, religion, law, mass media, education and business. They have infiltrated all religions and political parties of every stripe. In the US, they are coordinated by the CFR, CIA , the Rockefeller network of Foundations, NGO’s, think tanks, professional associations and Freemasonry.

Here are some more instructions for these operatives:

“You must work until “religion” is synonymous with “insanity. You must work until the officials of city, county and state governments will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies.” (II-14)

“Movements to improve youth should be invaded and corrupted, as this might interrupt campaigns to produce in youth delinquency, addiction, drunkenness, and sexual promiscuity.” (II-15) Think boy scouts.

Seek out ” the leaders in the country’s future, and educate them into the belief of the animalistic nature of Man. This must be made fashionable. They must be taught to frown upon ideas, upon individual endeavour. They must be taught, above all things that the salvation of Man is to be found only by his adjusting thoroughly to this environment. …Nations, which have high ethical tone, are difficult to conquer. (II-8)

CONCLUSION

As you can see, the gradual degradation of Western society, the obsession with possessions, pleasure, sex (pornography), violence and trivia, is not random or commercial in nature. It is a deliberate preparation for destruction and tyranny.

Politicians are psycho political agents. Their job is to lie and manipulate, i.e. brainwash us. Their masters are a Satan worshipping cabal headed by Jacob Rothschild headquartered in the City of London. They literally own the mass media; what they don’t own they control through advertising.

This cabal represents a marriage (often literally) between Illuminati Jewish finance and Anglo American “aristocracy.” This cabal is behind Communism, Zionism, Nazism, Liberalism, Socialism, Freemasonry and Feminism.

These ‘isms play a part in undermining the four pillars of human identity and solidarity: nation, race, religion and family. You can add liberty and private property, which they also intend to abolish (i.e. confiscate.)

It’s all outlined in the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which calls for an “aristocracy of wealth.” This is not a “forgery” and to say so is not anti Semitic.

Jews have been duped like everyone else. Millions of basically good people are fooled by idealistic-sounding platitudes: “change the world,” “create social justice,” fight the “Patriarchy,” stop “anti Semitism”, defeat “superstition” and bring ” freedom.”

As Gandhi said, “the devil uses honest people to do his work.”

We can recognize the moral and natural order by the happiness and health of those who follow it. Only genuinely religious people and conservatives appear willing to defend it.

You cannot make a deal with the devil. His enticements are only designed to weaken. His intention is to enslave and destroy.

Civilization depends on the belief that truth is absolute and knowable. The New World Order dictatorship depends on convincing us that truth is whatever they say it is.

It’s no coincidence that Hollywood and the entertainment industry in general is dominated by Cabalist Jews and Freemasons.

We are brainwashed. Will we awake before it is too late? Are we already too craven and venal to act? (This was written in 2004)

Ten Biden whoppers: From Afghanistan To The U.S. Border (President Biden and his senior officials have left a lengthy trail of broken promises, false assurances and fibs.)

Ten Biden whoppers: Afghanistan, COVID-19, national debt and the border

President Biden and his senior officials have left a lengthy trail of broken promises, false assurances and fibs

In just over eight months, President Joe Biden and his administration have been caught in a tangled web of broken promises, false assurances and fibs on a range of issues, including COVID-19, the southern border, the withdrawal from Afghanistan and the national debt. A short list of 10 of the most egregious examples follows:

1. No vaccine mandate:

Responding to a reporter’s question at a July White House press briefing regarding the federal government potentially issuing a vaccine mandate, Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that it was “not the role of the federal government; that is the role that institutions, private-sector entities, and others may take.” Answering a previous question, Psaki said, “I don’t think our role is to place blame” on unvaccinated people for putting others at risk of getting COVID-19.

However, Biden issued a vaccine mandate in September, blaming unvaccinated people for the continuing pandemic. “This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” he said.

2. If vaccinated, then no masks required:

In May, Biden announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was “no longer recommending that fully vaccinated people need [to] wear masks.” However, when Psaki was asked in late July about vaccinated people having to mask up again, she said that the CDC was revising its guidance because of the Delta variant.

3. The southern border is closed:

In March, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said to migrants: “The message is quite clear: Do not come. The border is closed, the border is secure. We are expelling families, we are expelling single adults under the CDC’s authority under Title 42 of the United States Code because we are in the midst of a pandemic, and that is a public health imperative.

Despite this message, over a million illegal immigrants entered the U.S. from January to July, and more fentanyl has come into the country from October to June than all of the 2020 fiscal year.

In June, Vice President Kamala Harris blamed Trump’s immigration policies, including the “Remain in Mexico” policy, for the border crisis. However, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said that according to Border Patrol, the policy was effective and they warned the Biden administration of the problems rescinding the policy would cause.

4. Border Patrol whipped a Haitian migrant:

Following the release of photos and video of Border Patrol agents in Del Rio, Texas on horseback keeping Haitian migrants from crossing the border and using reins to keep them at a safe distance from the horses, a reporter said in a White House press briefing that the agents were “seemingly using whips.” Psaki said the footage was “horrible to watch” and she couldn’t “imagine what the scenario is where that would be appropriate.” She added, “Of course, they should never be able to do it again.”

The day after the briefing, president of the National Border Patrol Council, Brandon Judd, criticized Psaki’s statements on the John Solomon Reports podcast, saying that the White House prejudged the situation. He explained that twirling the reins “is a legitimate law enforcement action” that keeps illegal immigrants away from the horses so they don’t get hurt.

“Nobody was hit by those reins; they are not whips,” Judd said. He added that the Biden administration had approved of “using the reins, to keep people away from the horses for their own protection.”

White House and media accounts of the situation were “factually wrong, yes,” he said. “And the White House knows that they’re factually wrong.”

The photographer who took the pictures of the agents that went viral said that he had “never seen” the agents “whip anyone.” He added that a picture of an agent who was swinging a rope or rein could “be misconstrued when you’re looking at the picture.”

Three days after Psaki’s comments, the Biden administration banned Border Patrol agents from using horses in Del Rio.

5. Trump didn’t leave a plan for Afghanistan withdrawal:

Secretary of State Antony Blinken told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the Trump administration didn’t leave behind a plan for withdrawing from Afghanistan. “We inherited a deadline, we did not inherit a plan,” he said.

Kash Patel, who served on the Trump transition coordination team and as chief of staff to acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, told the John Solomon Reports podcast that what Blinken said was untrue.

“We actually did not leave them a deadline,” he said. “It was a negotiation between the U.S. government, the Taliban, and the Afghans. And if that date was not to work for this incoming administration, they could have moved it. But what they chose to do was break the entire agreement.”

Patel detailed a few main components of the complex plan that Trump left for his successor, including getting Americans out of Afghanistan before abandoning Bagram Air Base.

6. Taliban won’t take power in Afghanistan quickly:

For months, the Biden administration assured Congress that Afghan government forces would be able to hold off the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal. In July, Biden told reporters that it was not inevitable that Afghanistan would fall to the Taliban because there were more Afghan forces and they were “better trained, better equipped, and more competent in terms of conducting war.”

Contrary to administration assurances, however, the terrorist organization rapidly swept to power in Afghanistan before American troops had even completed their withdrawal.

7. Military advisers didn’t recommend leaving a force behind in Afghanistan:

In an Aug.18 interview on ABC, George Stephanopoulos asked Biden whether his military advisers had told him the U.S. “should just keep 2,500 troops” in-country beyond the withdrawal deadline to preserve what had been “a stable situation for the last several years.”

“No,” Biden replied. “No one said that to me that I can recall.”

However, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, and commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. Kenneth McKenzie all told the Senate Committee on Armed Services this week that they had advised Biden to keep 2,500 troops in Afghanistan, based on the advice of Army Gen. Scott Miller, the last commander to lead U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

8. Al Qaeda is gone from Afghanistan:

On Aug. 20, Biden told a reporter: “We went to Afghanistan for the express purpose of getting rid of al Qaeda in Afghanistan, as well as getting Osama bin Laden. And we did.”

However, that same day, Pentagon Press Secretary Jack Kirby said: “We know that Al-Qaeda is a presence, as well as ISIS, in Afghanistan and we’ve talked about that for quite some time. We do not believe it is exorbitantly high but we don’t have an exact figure for you.”

9. $3.5 trillion spending package costs $0, won’t add to national debt:

“My Build Back Better Agenda costs zero dollars,” a post on Biden’s Twitter account reads. “Instead of wasting money on tax breaks, loopholes, and tax evasion for big corporations and the wealthy, we can make a once-in-a-generation investment in working America. And it adds zero dollars to the national debt.”

The Biden administration claims that tax increases will offset the cost of the bill.

However, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated the $3.5 trillion bill could actually cost up to $5.5 trillion over 10 years.

David Ditch, a federal spending and fiscal policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, said: “The $3.5 trillion in spending and tax credits combined with at least $2 trillion in tax hikes will add to the debt and have a tremendous cost to the economy and to the health of American families. The taxes will hit families taking home as little as $30,000 per year, violating President Biden’s promise.”

10. “Righteous” drone strike:

Milley initially called a drone strike that was intended to target ISIS-K terrorists “righteous.”

“At this point, we think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was a righteous strike,” he told reporters.

After investigating the strike, the military found that 10 civilians were actually killed in the drone strike, most of whom were children.

Vatican Trillion$ (I am a great supporter of the traditional Catholic church but I was not aware that the Vatican is second only to the Rothschilds in worldly wealth.)

(No surprise that the Vatican has gone over to Satanism)

Matt 6 21 “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”

I am a great supporter of the
traditional Catholic church
but I was not awarethat the Vatican is second only
to the Rothschilds in worldly wealth.

This is the Catholic Church I know and love:Pope Leo XIII (Pope 1878-1903)  on Freemasonry

Francis is a Freemason, a Satanist and an Imposter

The Zionist Luciferian Jewish Rothschilds took over all the financial operations of the worldwide Catholic Church in 1823 and purchased Jerusalem in 1829.

Today the large banking and financial business of the Catholic Church is an extensive system interlocked with the Rothschilds and the rest of the International Banking system Rothschilds control in addition to their own fortune (estimated at over half of the wealth of the entire world.) The immense liquid resource of the Catholic Church is second only to the Rothschilds’ in wealth and power.

“The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others.

“The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations such as Gulf Oil, Shell, General Motors, Bethlehem Steel, General Electric, International Business Machines, T.W.A., etc.” (…)

“In a statement published in connection with a bond prospectus, the Boston archdiocese listed its assets at Six Hundred and Thirty-five Million ($635,891,004), which is 9.9 times its liabilities. This leaves a net worth of Five Hundred and Seventy-one million dollars ($571,704,953). It is not difficult to discover the truly astonishing wealth of the church, once we add the riches of the twenty-eight archdioceses and 122 dioceses of the U.S.A., some of which are even wealthier than that of Boston.

“Some idea of the real estate and other forms of wealth controlled by the Catholic church may be gathered by the remark of a member of the New York Catholic Conference, namely ‘that his church probably ranks second only to the United States Government in total annual purchase.’

“Another statement, made by a nationally syndicated Catholic priest, perhaps is even more telling. ‘The Catholic church,’ he said, ‘must be the biggest corporation in the United States. We have a branch office in every neighborhood. Our assets and real estate holdings must exceed those of Standard Oil, A.T.&T., and U.S. Steel combined. And our roster of dues-paying members must be second only to the tax rolls of the United States Government.'”

(…) “The Catholic church, once all her assets have been put together, is the most formidable stockbroker in the world. The Vatican, independently of each successive pope, has been increasingly orientated towards the U.S. The Wall Street Journal said that the Vatican’s financial deals in the U.S. alone were so big that very often it sold or bought gold in lots of a million or more dollars at one time.” (…)

“The Vatican’s treasure of solid gold has been estimated by the United Nations World Magazine to amount to several billion dollars. A large bulk of this is stored in gold ingots with the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, while banks in England and Switzerland hold the rest. “But this is just a small portion of the wealth of the Vatican, which in the U.S. alone, is greater than that of the five wealthiest giant corporations of the country. When to that is added all the real estate, property, stocks and shares abroad, then the staggering accumulation of the wealth of the Catholic church becomes so formidable as to defy any rational assessment.”

The CDC Changes the ‘Definition of Vaccines’

Story at-a-glance

  • In a surreptitious move to support the vaccine narrative, the CDC quietly changed the over 20-year definition of a vaccine, so it no longer says that vaccines produce immunity
  • The World Health Organization changed the definition of a pandemic, so it no longer says there are “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses,” only that there is a new virus without known human immunity
  • Health experts are pushing the vaccine program based on the promise of herd immunity. However, the NIAID has said that you can have breakthrough infections and spread those infections to others
  • The WHO defines herd immunity from vaccines as those that protect you from getting the disease and passing it on. This means by the WHO definition the shots will never provide herd immunity; how long will it take for the WHO to change the definition again?

••••

CDC Changes the Definition of Vaccines

In a surreptitious move to support the vaccine narrative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly changed the definition of a vaccine,1,2 which they have held since at least February 24, 2011.3 At first glance, it might seem like a small change, but it has massive repercussions.

The meaning of words can change over time, and can be influenced by social, economic, political, religious and technological factors. Many of the words we use today have vastly different meanings than they did 10 or 100 years ago.4 However, changing medical words and definitions has a significant impact on bias in perception. One study demonstrated that a simple switch in terminology could result:5

“… in a disease being perceived as more serious, more likely to be a disease, and more likely to be a rare condition. These findings regarding the conceptualization of disease have implications for many areas, including medical communication with the public, advertising, and public policy.”

For example, medical literature has redefined the meaning of “health” over several decades to move from the absence of disease to a state of well-being. That definition continues to evolve in light of value-based health care, which some recommend should now include “specific patient needs, and the organizational, value-based system required to satisfy those needs.”6

This change in definition then affects health care delivery, public perception and interpretation of the meaning of health. This strategy was not lost on the CDC when they removed critical words from the definition of a “vaccine” to change the public perception of any administered therapy that may impact a person’s immune system.

This opens the door to the administration of other “products” or “preparations” that may affect your immune system, still while calling it a vaccine. And, let’s face it, for much of the public, the word “vaccine” continues to have positive implications.

CDC Removes Critical Words From Vaccine Definition

To fully understand the importance of the change, it’s crucial to note that, before the COVID pandemic, the definition of a vaccine had been relatively stable for nearly a couple decades with minor word changes occurring every few years. All through that time the intent of a vaccine — to give you immunity by protecting you from a specific disease — had remained basically the same.

For example, according to an archived snapshot of the CDC’s website, the definition of a vaccine February 24, 2011, was:7

“A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.”

By July 2015, the wording had changed to:8

“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed in the nose.”

The wording was the same in June 20179 and likewise in June 201910 and June 2020.11 By August 26, 2021,12 however, the definition had changed slightly to add the words “to produce immunity”:13

“A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

Then, less than a week later, just days after the FDA gave final approval to Pfizer’s mRNA jab, the definition changed again, September 1, 2021 — this time, significantly. The definition of a vaccine now reads:14

“A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”

As you’ll note, the second sentence remains the same. It is the first part of the definition that has dramatically changed. In the latest definition, a vaccine:

  • Is no longer a “product” but instead is a “preparation”
  • No longer directly stimulates the immune response, but is used to stimulate the system
  • Does not produce immunity
  • Stimulates the immune response against diseases, not against a specific disease
  • No longer protects a person from the disease

These dramatic changes were likely created to allow the CDC, FDA and other governmental agencies to call the genetic therapy experiment being administered worldwide a “vaccine” — while they knew full well the so-called “vaccine” was not created to either produce immunity or prevent transmission of disease. In fact, by any definition of a vaccine in use before 2021, this jab is not a vaccine.

Organizations Are Changing the Goal Posts

Alex Berenson was once a reporter for The New York Times and is now an award-winning author. He published a timeline of events on a Substack page that he calls “A Lawsuit in Three Acts.”15 In Act I is an August 26, 2021, screenshot of the CDC website, with the prior definition of a vaccine as you can see above. Act II is a screenshot of a tweet Berenson posted August 28, 2021:

“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.”

Following the release of that tweet, Twitter ruled the information misleading and suspended his account16 for “violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules.”17 As Berenson writes, “This defamatory act prevents me from using my account anywhere in the world.”18

Within days of Berenson’s ban, Act III occurred. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine, removing the standard that had been in place for at least 20 years that vaccines produce immunity. In his last comment, Berenson alludes to the acts of censorship that have been ongoing in social media platforms since the beginning of this pandemic, writing, “Discovery’s gonna be awesome!”19

September 8, 2021, one of Berenson’s followers, Carol Jones, commented, “LOL!!! My lawyer husband just laughed when he read this. That is a slam dunk.” As a side note, Merriam-Webster Dictionary’s definition of a vaccine once was:20

“… a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”

However, before the CDC changed its definition, Merriam-Webster had already changed theirs, which now includes a secondary description of the experimental COVID-19 genetic therapy.21 Interestingly, when they made the change, the definition evolved from a simple, single line to a much more complex 12-paragraph definition that is a reflection of the times we live in.

The movement toward changing the definition of a vaccine may help protect the pharmaceutical industry and health agencies from violating a Federal Trade Commission act that regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. According to this it is unlawful to say:22

“… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”

And further, you cannot have a vaccine that does not meet the definition of a vaccine. Currently, the COVID-19 genetic therapy injection program does meet the vaccine definition of the CDC and Merriam-Webster — but only after the definitions changed.

What Is a Pandemic?

The definition of a vaccine is not the only thing that has changed since 2020. To continue promoting mandates, lockdowns and emergency use authorization of genetic therapy injections, the infection must be causing a pandemic.

According to the World Health Organization, their original definition of a pandemic specified that there must be simultaneous epidemics experienced worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses.”23

While the published documents with the definition of a pandemic have since been pulled offline and cannot be accessed any longer through the Wayback machine, the WHO published a paper refuting the allegations that they had changed the definition “for the simple reason that it has never formally defined pandemic influenza.”24

They argued that while they had described a pandemic influenza, it was never a “formal definition.” In their explanation they say that since 2003 their pandemic preparedness page had contained this statement:25

“An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”

They claim that was changed in response to a query from a CNN reporter just weeks before they declared a swine flu pandemic after only 144 people died from the infection worldwide. The new statement removed the phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” and was revised to:26 “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.”

The Council of Europe apparently had the same question and cited this alteration in their page as evidence that the WHO could declare a pandemic without demonstrating the severity of the disease against which we didn’t have immunity.27

Unfortunately, the number of excess deaths that can be attributed directly to COVID-19 is likely not be the result of the infection itself, but from the CDC’s and NIAID’s suppression of successful treatment modalities that can save lives.28,29,30,31,32

Vaccine Sales Pitch: Herd Immunity

Health experts promote the idea of herd immunity, hoping 100% of the public will become vaccinated. However, in July 2021 the news reported that 100 fully vaccinated crew members aboard the British defense aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth had tested positive while onboard. At the time, it was unclear whether any had symptoms.33

This was one of the first reports that vaccinated individuals could have breakthrough infections, aka, “vaccine failure.” Vaccine failure would indicate that herd immunity is impossible. But, of course, that depends on your definition of herd immunity.

In June 2020, WHOs definition was posted on their COVID-19 Q&A page and was in line with widely accepted standards for infectious diseases. Courtesy of the Wayback machine, the original definition was:34

“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”

Since humans have been alive, immunity has developed from previous infection. Your immune system is designed to work in response to exposure to an infectious agent, not to a vaccine. However, since October 15, 2020, the WHO believes this is no longer the case, as they updated their definition of herd immunity to a “concept used for vaccination” or, rather, to support vaccination:35

“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.

Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission.”

The page was again updated on December 31, 2020:36

“’Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination …

Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission.

To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”

As you can see from the areas I put in boldface in the two definitions above, the WHO definition of a vaccine and the CDC definition are not congruent. In this statement, the WHO says that vaccines protect the individual from getting the disease or passing on the pathogen. The current CDC definition37 says that vaccines merely “stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” without mention of immunity, protection or passing pathogens.

This means the definition of a vaccine by the WHO does not cover the function of the COVID-19 genetic therapy program, since the mRNA gene therapy’s purpose is only to lessen symptoms. The NIAID admits that after the mRNA shots people can still get breakthrough infections38 (so they aren’t protected from getting the disease) and will have enough pathogens in their nasal cavity to spread the disease39 (they are passing on the pathogen).

Even with the changes the WHO made to their definition of herd immunity, it is apparent that the COVID-19 injection program will never meet the standards of herd immunity set by the WHO. The only question is how long will it take the WHO to change their definition again?

Living in a World Where Goal Posts Are Constantly Changing

In this short video, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, gives an accounting of Dr. Anthony Fauci vacillating on his recommendations regarding masking in public. Fauci was appointed as the director of the NIAID in 1984 which, by 2020, should have made him an expert on the transmission of infectious diseases.

Yet, as is apparent by this historical recounting, the recommendations evolve depending on the current climate, just as the definitions of herd immunity, vaccines and pandemics have evolved.

These definitions have been changed to fit the new narrative being churned out by public health officials and mainstream media that promote fear and ignore science. In many ways, you’re living in a fog of war right now — a fog of COVID war — according to Jeffrey Tucker, editorial director of the American Institute for Economic Research.40

During such a fog, “It is often unclear who is making decisions and why, and what the relationships are between the strategies and the goals. Even the rationale can become elusive as frustration and disorientation displace clarity and rationality.”41 Seeing through the fog is the first step to coming out of the battle unscathed.

I would encourage you to copy the content from this article and save it to your hard drive so you can share this information and help others see through this fog of misinformation and lies that is threatening our way of life.

Vaccine Mandates Wreak Havoc on Healthcare System, Workforce

COVIDMandates Wreak Havoc on Healthcare System, Workforce

Draconian COVID policies and vaccine mandates are creating an uncertain future for a health care system that was already on shaky ground even before the terrible COVID policies took hold.

In January 2020 — pre-COVID — the Commonwealth Fund published a sobering report on the state of U.S. healthcare, comparing the U.S. to other high-income countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The report shared a number of depressing findings. First, despite the U.S. spending twice as much on healthcare (as a share of the economy) as comparable wealthy nations, Americans have the lowest life expectancy and highest suicide rates. Nor is America’s poor bang for its healthcare buck anything sudden or new — a 30-year-old study that compared the U.S. to 15 OECD nations reached the same conclusions.

The Commonwealth Fund report also drew attention to the fact that, among peer nations, the U.S. has the highest chronic disease burden, the highest number of hospitalizations from “preventable causes” and the highest rate of “avoidable deaths.”

Restrictive COVID policies have worsened these health indicators, with mounting deaths of despair and a plummeting life expectancy that researchers predict will drop still further.

The draconian policies — and especially COVID vaccine mandates for healthcare workers (HCWs) — are also wreaking havoc on the U.S. healthcare system and health workforce. Astoundingly high percentages of HCWs have experienced adverse events after accepting the jabs, rendering some unfit for duty. And among HCWs who, having done their due diligence, have chosen to decline the injections, firings and resignations are growing increasingly commonplace. These kinds of handicaps portend an uncertain future for a healthcare system that was already on shaky ground even before the terrible COVID policies took hold.

Early guinea pigs

As soon as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted Emergency Use Authorization for the COVID vaccines, HCWs began to find themselves in a catch-22: take an experimental injection (made by felonious pharma giants exempt from legal liability for injuries) or — egged on by hostile parties that now include no less than POTUS himself — risk ostracism or worse.

Many HCWs who dutifully did what they were told have not fared well. An online survey of 1,245 HCWs published in April (“representing various parts of the country during the early phase of COVID-19 vaccination”) furnishes one particularly hair-raising glimpse of the potential risks — for both provider and patient.

The study focused on roughly 800 HCWs (46% younger than age 41 and nearly all with doctoral, medical or Master’s degrees) who received the Pfizer vaccine and reported one or more symptoms. Almost all (93%) had received two doses.

Post-vaccination, about one in eight HCWs “temporarily” had trouble performing activities of daily living. In addition, the survey results highlighted the following:

  • Symptoms such as fatigue, headache, joint pain, nausea, muscle spasm, sweating, dizziness, flushing, brain fog, anorexia, sleep disruptions, tingling and palpitations were common.
  • Grouped by organ system, large percentages of the Pfizer-injected HCWs reported symptoms that were “generalized” (76%) or musculoskeletal (53%). However, the injections also displayed the capacity to affect nearly every body system: gastrointestinal (21%), psychological/psychiatric (17%), neurological (13%), otolaryngological (12%), endocrine (10%), cardiovascular (6%), respiratory (3%), urinary (1%) and allergic (1%).
  • The principal neurological symptom reported was brain fog or “reduced mental clarity” — a disabling symptom that can scarcely be reassuring to the affected individuals’ patients. This category also included reports of symptoms such as numbness, paralysis, vertigo and reactivation of herpes or shingles. These types of neurological symptoms are no joke; some HCWs have reported being denied health insurance and Workers’ Compensation despite symptoms so debilitating that they can no longer work.
  • In the otolarnygological category, ear and eye symptoms predominated, included ear ringing, changes in hearing, ear/eye pain, blurred vision and “flashing lights.” The vision-related symptoms dovetail with data from the European drug monitoring agency, which has recorded tens of thousands of eye disorders following COVID vaccination.
  • Oddly, 6% of Pfizer recipients reported upbeat feelings of joy, relief or gratitude in response to receiving the injections. The researchers characterized this as a “positive sign” of HCW willingness to “[take] the challenge to end the deadly pandemic, irrespective of side effects experienced.”

In early 2021, Czech researchers conducted a nearly identical HCW survey. Virtually all of the respondents (n=818), about a third of whom had at least one chronic illness at baseline, received two doses of the Pfizer shot, and 93% of the latter reported one or more side effects. Disturbingly, the prevalence of adverse reactions was consistently higher in younger (< 43 years old) HCWs with more of their careers ahead of them. Almost one in ten Pfizer recipients reported symptoms lasting for a week or more. Nevertheless, the researchers gaily concluded that healthcare workers and students “are among the ideal population groups to participate in this type of studies [sic] due to their high level of health literacy and scientific motivation.”

No thanks

From the beginning of the COVID vaccines’ rollout, surveys have indicated that HCWs are “somewhat more skeptical [about COVID vaccine safety] compared to the general public.” In early January, one in four surveyed HCWs indicated that they had no plans to ever get a COVID shot, with “wariness of going first” being one of the commonly cited reasons. In many healthcare settings, far larger proportions than 25% have chosen to remain unvaccinated.

In an opinion piece that appeared in HuffPost in February, senior reporter Jeffrey Young patronizingly explained that HCWs have “complicated” reasons for rejecting COVID shots, but he kindly suggested that those reasons do not make them “conspiracy theorists.” Somewhat more aptly, Young stated that HCWs “have watched the government bungle so many aspects of the COVID-19 response that when those same authority figures tell them to get vaccinated first, essentially to be guinea pigs for new vaccines, their messages aren’t always well-received.”

Months later, HCWs have had numerous opportunities to observe first-hand the post-jab travails of injected colleagues and patients, and for many, this has only intensified their “wariness.” In late August, two thousand HCWs filed a lawsuit in the state of Maine to block COVID vaccine mandates, arguing their wish “to be able to continue to provide the healthcare they have provided to patients for their entire careers, and to do so under the same protective measures that have sufficed for them to be considered superheroes for the last 18 months.”

The administration of Maine Governor Janet Mills is requiring that all HCWs in the state be vaccinated by Oct. 1. Outgoing New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a similar HCW vaccine mandate in August, stating that HCWs would be required to get a first dose even sooner (by Sept. 27), but on Sept. 14, District Judge David Hurd granted a temporary restraining order suspending the mandate because the state unlawfully disallowed religious exemptions available under federal law and the Constitution.

States imposing top-down HCW mandates may need to brace for some heavy fallout. The U.S. is already in the midst of an unprecedented nursing shortage, and as the mandates drive out even more of the best and brightest, the situation promises to get worse. Healthcare analysts point out that shortages of skilled nurses have major implications for patient care, with consequences ranging from longer wait times (and shorter visits), to less available care in rural settings to a higher risk of medication errors and even patient deaths.

The U.S. is also facing a shortfall of doctors. The pre-COVID Commonwealth Fund report — which found that Americans, even though sicker than their healthier counterparts in other wealthy nations, go to the doctor less often — suggested that physician shortages could be a contributing factor.

Get your care now

With an eye on the vaccine-mandate-impelled nursing shortage, former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson advised in August, “if you need to get sick, do it before the mandates hit Oct. 1.”

Though Berenson’s warning may have been somewhat tongue in cheek, a New York hospital announced earlier this month that it would be putting maternity services on hold after Sept. 24 due to resignations from maternity staff opposed to the mandates. In addition to stating that “The number of resignations received leaves…no choice but to pause delivering babies,” the hospital’s CEO indicated that services in five other units could be “curtailed in some way” if more hospital staff end up choosing departure over vaccination.

While noting that 70% of the resignations thus far have been from staff working in crucial clinical positions, the hospital CEO maintained that he was “unequivocally” in favor of mandatory vaccination.

The pausing of maternity services may inconvenience pregnant women with late September due dates, but the clinical staff fleeing heavy-handed mandates can hardly be blamed for objecting to the Hobbesian choice between risks to life and livelihood. As Children’s Health Defense president Mary Holland forcefully reiterated in response to President Biden’s inflammatory demonization of the unvaccinated, “The Nuremberg Code, which the U.S. promulgated and has expanded over time, says it best: ‘The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.’”

What is the end game?

Kaiser Family Foundation characterizes the healthcare workforce impacts of COVID vaccine mandates as “unintended consequences,” but one has to wonder whether the medical and political establishment could truly be blind to the fact that so many “health-literate” HCWs would choose to decline the injections.

Many strangely “counter intuitive” episodes have transpired within the health system over the past 18 months, including widespread and dramatic health workforce layoffs and facility closures early last year, at precisely the same time that the media were trumpeting the emergency and celebrating HCWs for their heroism in the COVID trenches.

With COVID-19 clearly serving as the pretext to orchestrate a vast  and governance in favor of more centralization and surveillance, it stands to reason that the medical-pharmaceutical cartel may be seizing the opportunity to catalyze similar health system changes. The departure of seasoned HCWs accustomed to providing competent in-person care could, in fact, facilitate the desired push for more virtual healthcare and telemedicine, a CDC-encouraged trend that will send far more patient data into the waiting hands of cloud services providers like Amazon and Microsoft.

For people who desire face-to-face care, and for ethical healthcare workers whose gift is to provide that type of care, it may be time to come up with a new model, one that perhaps emphasizes old-fashioned prevention — good nutrition and plenty of sunlight and exercise — over newfangled, gene-modifying injections that thus far have proven more effective at lining pockets than in doing anything useful for health.

Marx Got It Right: Mass Immigration Wrecks Wages. Why Won’t America’s Resurgent Communists Admit It?

Believe it or not, as Ripley used to say, Communist theoretician Karl Marx anticipated a key economic argument against mass immigration that VDARE.com has made since its beginning: Unfettered immigration depresses wages for host-nation workers. That Marx was wrong in his overall critique of capitalism, most notably his prediction that it was doomed, did not make him wrong on everything. On immigration, Marx was on the right side of the debate, if not necessarily for the right reasons. Oddly, America’s resurgent Communists don’t seem to have noticed.

Consider a letter of 1870 to Sigfrid Meyer and August Vogt, German friends in the United States. Citing the effects of large-scale Irish immigration upon England, Marx explained the destabilizing effect of cheap immigrant labor: “Owing to the constantly increasing concentration of leaseholds, Ireland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class,” the primordial Prussian Communist wrote [Marx to Sigfrid Meyer and August Vogt, Marxists.org, April 9, 1870].

That isn’t all he wrote on the subject, but that little gem suggests that Marx understood at least something about supply and demand, and wages, labor, and immigration. Mass immigration depressed 19th-century British wages j ust as it depresses American wages today.

A little history:

During the second half of the 19th century, the “Irish question” weighed heavily on English minds. Many Irish boarded ships for the short trip to England. Ireland was part of the United Kingdom, which had open borders for all its subjects. Even after 1921, residents of the “Irish Free State” did not need a passport or visa to enter the U.K.

Irish began migrating to England in the Middle Ages, but what began as a trickle became a flood during and after the Great Famine of 1845-52. Nor did they go to England for “a better life,” as the Treason Lobby cliché goes these days. Getting to the Sceptr’d Isle was a matter of life and death. The Irish depended for food almost entirely on the potato, but the blight had struck. Irish farmers couldn’t increase output on their tiny plots of land, and couldn’t do anything about it because of the entrenched system of British absentee ownership. Disaster was inevitable. Of roughly 8.25 million people living in Ireland in 1845, close to a million starved to death and another 2 million emigrated during the next several years. Most emigration occurred within Great Britain, with 1.52 million Irish migrating to England, Scotland and Wales between 1850 and 1888.

The Irish wanted the jobs available in London, Liverpool, Manchester and other cities, and employers wanted something else: cheap labor. More than their English counterparts, Irish laborers accepted minimal wages and brutal workplace conditions. Exploiting that desperation, factory owners had every incentive to treat Irish and English workers as expendable. After all, if the flood of Irish workers would accept a pittance to get a job, English workers would accept a pittance to keep a job.

Of course, workers could organize to improve their lot. To head that off, many employers hired the least organizable employees, especially from among the Irish: women and children. Writing in 1888, Annie Besant, a muckraking English reformer, noted the conditions for girls and women at the Bryant and May match factory in London’s East End: 14-hour work days, weekly wages of 4 to 8 shillings, excessive fines for petty offenses, and extreme health risks [Women and work in the 19th century, StrikingWomen.org].

Work began at 6:30 a.m. in the summer and 8 a.m. in the winter. The women worked until 6 p.m., with 30 minutes for breakfast and one hour for dinner. “A typical case is that of a girl of 16, a piece-worker; she earns 4s a week,” Besant wrote:

Out of the earnings, 2s is paid for the rent of one room; the child lives on only bread-and-butter and tea, alike for breakfast and dinner, but related with dancing eyes that once a month she went to a meal where “you get coffee, and bread and butter, and jam, and marmalade, and lots of it.” … The splendid salary of 4s is subject to deductions in the shape of fines; if the feet are dirty, or the ground under the bench is left untidy, a fine of 3d is inflicted.

[White slavery in LondonThe Link, June 23, 1888]

A month later, about 200 workers went on strike after three were fired for speaking to Besant. Most of the strikers were women with Irish surnames who lived near each other [The Match Workers Strike Fund Register, UnionHistory.info].

Remarkably, the strike succeeded. After three weeks, the employer met their demands, and the workers formed a match workers union.

Still, the Irish apparently accepted their lot in life. Echoing Marx, his collaborator Friedrich Engels described the appalling Irish slums of Manchester, where he lived from 1842 to 44. Engels’ wealthy father owned a textile factory.

“The Irishmen who migrate for four pence to England on the deck of a steamship on which they are often packed like cattle, insinuate themselves everywhere,” the coauthor of the Communist Manifesto wrote.

The worst dwellings are good enough for them; their clothing causes them little troubles, so long as it holds together by a single thread; shoes they know not; their food consists of potatoes and potatoes only; whatever they earn beyond these needs is usually spent upon drink. What does such a race want with high wages? The worst quarters of all the large towns are inhabited by Irishmen. Whenever a district is distinguished for especial filth and especial ruinousness, the explorer may safely count upon meeting chiefly those Celtic faces which one recognizes at first glance as different from the Saxon physiognomy of the native, and the singing, aspirate brogue which the true Irishman never loses.

[The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844]

But the Irish were stuck. Conditions were bad in England, but worse back home. Indeed, in 1836, almost a decade before the initial publication of Engels’ book and the start of Ireland’s Great Famine, the Royal Commission on the Condition of the Poorer Classes in Ireland explained the migration.:

Nothing seems more natural than that labourers should go from places where they are not wanted and wages are low, to places where they are wanted and wages are high. [Consequently] the emigration from Ireland to England and Scotland is of a very remarkable character, and is perhaps nearly unparalleled in the history of the world. … The kind of work at which they are employed is usually of the roughest, coarsest, and most repulsive description, and requiring the least skill and practice.

[Report into the State of the Irish Poor in Great Britain].

Put simply, English employers used the Irish to lower wages, as the commission noted. Textile master John Potter “criticized their submission to lower living standards,” and said “they seem as content with 9s or 10s a week, as an Englishman would with 14s or 16s.”

But back to Marx, who, again, noted that mass immigration lowers wages. “Every industrial and commercial centre in England now possesses a working class divided into two hostile camps, English proletarians and Irish proletarianism,” Marx wrote to Meyer and Vogt.

It was a condition, he thought, that would hasten the revolution because of immigration’s effect on the little guy: “The ordinary English worker hates the Irish worker as a competitor who lowers his standard of life. In relation to the Irish worker he regards himself as a member of the ruling nation and consequently he becomes a tool of the English aristocrats and capitalists against Ireland, thus strengthening their domination over himself.”

Marx continued:

He cherishes religious, social, and national prejudices against the Irish worker. His attitude towards him is much the same as that of the “poor whites” to the Negroes in the former slave states of the U.S.A. The Irishman pays him back with interest in his own money. He sees in the English worker both the accomplice and the stupid tool of the English rulers in Ireland.

This antagonism is artificially kept alive and intensified by the press, the pulpit, the comic papers, in short, by all the means at the disposal of the ruling classes. This antagonism is the secret of the impotence of the English working class, despite its organization. It is the secret by which the capitalist class maintains its power. And the latter is quite aware of this.

Sound familiar? Ireland was to England in 1850, as Mexico and Central America are to the United States in 2021. The Irish did the jobs the English wouldn’t do! The parallels are clear:

  • Open Borders;
  • cheap foreign labor that lowers wages;
  • Government support for employers of low-wage labor;
  • and frustration among the host country’s low-paid workers.

Yet despite the parallels, differences abound:

  1. Marx believed Irish nationalism would end the exploitation of Irish labor. “After studying the Irish question for many years,” he wrote, “I have come to the conclusion that the decisive blow against the English ruling classes (and it will be decisive for the workers’ movement all over the world) cannot be delivered in England but only in Ireland.
    A half-century later, of course, Ireland did win independence from England. Neither country went Communist. Would Marx say the same thing today about Mexico, which won its independence from Spain in 1821? Not likely.
  2. Even had the English restricted immigration, the humanitarian case for admitting the Irish was compelling. The Potato Blight caused a famine. That is not the case in Mexico or Central America. Few are actually starving, as one can surmise from the ponderous girth of many immigrants. If they die prematurely, the cause is likely to be mayhem and murder linked to drug-trafficking.
  3. Despite inevitable economic and cultural antagonisms, the Irish were British subjects who could and did assimilate. If nothing else, they spoke the same language (mostly) and were ethnically close. They were also culturally close. Ireland was “deeply Victorian” [Victoria’s Ireland: Britishness and Irishness, 1837-1901, HistoryIreland.com]. By contrast, the Historic American Nation and the recent Amerindian/dark Mestizo arrivals are nothing alike. Time Magazine’s wet dream of a Café au lait “Amexica” is just that: a dream. Language alone impedes assimilation of those immigrants, thanks to that expensive and politicized contrivance called “bilingual education.”
  4. Unlike England 150 years ago, the United States has constructed a large welfare state that shifts the cost of labor from employers to taxpayers. The 19th-century Irish were not public charges, unlike a large portion of Hispanic immigrants here, as economists George Borjas of Harvard and Steve Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies have shown. Ideally, employers would cover employee expenses through better wages and benefits. Yet with immigration at current levels, they have little incentive to do so.

So what of the contemporary Left and its virulent if not unhinged opposition to immigration control? Leftists rightly call out employers for exploiting immigrant labor, although very often, immigrant workers are at the mercy of business owners either from the same country or whose ancestors were. Many arrived or were transported here illegally. Plus the heavy reliance by American employers on the H-2B and other nonagricultural entry-level work visas raises the likelihood that even the immigrants here legally are often at their mercy.

It is hardly a coincidence that low-wage sweatshops are most prevalent in urban centers with large populations of first-generation Asians and Hispanics. During April-July 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor investigated 77 garment operations in Los Angeles. Workers there were paid on average $7 an hour—and often a good deal less—and worked 10 hours a day. Retailers such as Forever 21, Marshalls, Ross, and TJ Maxx enjoyed the benefits. At the time, workers who produced clothing for Forever 21 alone had filed hundreds of back-pay claims since 2007. “The whole problem devolved from the retailer,” noted David Weil, former head of the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division. “They force the production costs to as low as they want because of their power in the supply chain, with the result ultimately the workers bearing the whole cost and risk of the system” [Behind a $13 shirt, a $6-an-hour worker, by Natalie Kitroeff and Victoria Kim, Los Angeles Times, August 31, 2017].

“Building The Wall” and otherwise cracking down on illegal immigration, by the way, will go only so far in combating such labor exploitation. Studies on human trafficking by the Urban Institute and the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit group Polaris reveal that exploited immigrant workers typically arrive here legally with temporary visas, then work illegally, only to be threatened with firing if they get too uppity with the boss about working conditions [Understanding the Organization, Operation, and Victimization Process of Labor Trafficking in the United States, by Colleen Owens, et al, October 21, 2014].

Yet the Left, which so concerns itself with immigration and labor exploitation, thwarted President Trump’s modest efforts to protect American workers with immigration controls at almost every turn. Where is the traditional patriotic constituency within the egalitarian Left to resist not only the exploitation of wage-lowering immigrant workers, but also lobby on behalf of American workers whom mass immigration harms?

Answer: Nowhere. Now that The Great Replacement is underway, the Left, almost exclusively focused on race, feels no obligation for those workers because most of them are white.

Left-wing unions consistently, and suicidally, support Democrats for elected office against the wishes and best interests of their members. Cornell University labor economist Vernon Briggs has noted that union leaders from the 1920s through the 1980s opposed large-scale immigration as undercutting their collective bargaining power. [Immigration Policy and Low Wage Workers: The Influence of American Unionism, by Vernon M. Briggs Jr., CIS.org, October 30, 2003]. But worried about sagging membership, which diminishes collective bargaining power, they now support mass immigration and Amnesty for illegals to replenish the ranks.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, once seemed an exception to the new rule that Leftists must support Open Borders. “It does not make a lot of sense to me to bring hundreds of thousands of those workers into this country to work for minimum wage and compete with American kids,” he said of the 2013’s Gang of Eight Amnesty. Open borders, he said, “was a Koch brothers proposal.” This apparent heresy even won him praise among some Republicans.

But predictably, Sanders reverted to type for his initial presidential campaign. “It is time to bring our neighbors out of the shadows,” he tweeted in June 2015. “It is time to give them legal status.” When he ran again four years later, he was another Open Borders cliché machine.

The cognitive dissonance of the American Left on immigration and the American worker is remarkable. On the one hand, the Left demands Open Borders to create the ethnic kaleidoscope supposedly envisioned by the Founders. On the other, they demand a $15-per-hour federal minimum wage and coerced union membership.

Then again, the Left had apoplexy when middle-American workers backed Donald Trump for president because they believed, as Trump said, that mass immigration lowers wages and threatens their jobs!

A cross-ideological coalition to support an immigration moratorium is desperately needed. Increasingly resentful taxpayers and American workers, and not just whites, pay the tab for immigration. Along with reading Marx on immigration, contemporary Leftists should consider Philip Cafaro’s recent book, How Many Is Too Many?: The Progressive Argument for Reducing Immigration into the United States.

Right and Left inevitably will disagree on most things, and often ferociously. But they can stand together on the principle that governments should not permit the wage-crushing exploitation of foreign labor.

Even Marx understood that.

Carl F. Horowitz [Email him] is project director for National Legal and Policy Center, a Falls Church, Va.-based nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in American public life. He has a Ph.D. in urban planning and public policy, and has taught in the urban and regional planning program at Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

Totalitarian Regimes are Overthrown by Force- There can be no compromise with Satan. Not because of us. We’re corrupt and flexible. But Satan wants us dead or in chains.

“In the course of history, totalitarian regimes have been overthrown by force.It is difficult to think that the health dictatorship… can be fought differently, since all the powers of the State, all of the means of information, all the international public and private institutions, all of the economic and financial potentates are complicit in this crime.”

There can be no compromise with Satan. Not because of us. We’re corrupt and flexible. But Satan wants us dead or in chains. He gives us no option but to fight for survival and for a better world.

No one will be part of the New World Order
unless he carries out an act of worship to Lucifer.
No one will enter the New Age unless he receives Luciferian initiation.
                 –David Spangler, Director of the United Nations Planetary Initiative Project (Reflections on The Christ, Findhorn, 1978)

In 1991, David Rockefeller wrote: “The world is ready for a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is certainly preferable to the national self-determination practiced in past centuries.”

And he added: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the ‘right’ global crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

Today we can affirm that this “right crisis” coincides with the pandemic emergency and with the “lockstep” outlined since 2010 by the Rockefeller Foundation document “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.”

In short, they have created a false problem in order to be able to impose population control measures as an apparent solution, cancel small and medium-sized businesses with lockdowns and the green pass to the benefit of a few international groups, demolish education by imposing distance learning, lower the cost of manpower and employees with “smart working,” privatize public health for the benefit of Big Pharma, and allow governments to use the state of emergency to legislate in derogation of the law and impose so-called vaccines on the entire population, making citizens traceable in all their movements and either chronically ill or sterile.

Everything the elite wanted to do, they have done. And what is incomprehensible is that in the face of the evidence of the premeditation of this terrible crime against humanity, which sees the leaders of almost the whole world as accomplices and traitors, there is not a single magistrate who opens a file against them to ascertain the truth and condemn the guilty and complicit.

Those who disagree are not only censored but pointed out as public enemies, as infectors, as non-persons for whom no rights are recognized.
TRAITORSEVERYONE PROMOTING THE PSY OP

The list of traitors should start with the heads of government, with cabinet members and elected officials, and then continue with the virologists and corrupt doctors, the complicit officials, the leaders of the armed forces incapable of opposing the violation of the Constitution, the sold-out journalists, the cowardly judges and the obsequious unions.

In that long list that will perhaps be drawn up one day, the leaders of the Catholic Church should also be listed, starting with Bergoglio and not a few of the Bishops, who have become zealous executors of the will of the prince against the mandate received from Christ.

And certainly, in that list, one would know the extent of the conspiracy and the number of the conspirators, confirming the crisis of authority and the perversion of civil and religious power.

In short, it would be understood that the corrupt part of the civil authority — the deep state — and the corrupt part of ecclesiastical authority — the deep church — are two sides of the same coin, both instrumental to the establishment of the New World Order….   

ALL SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS HAVE BEEN DISCREDITED

The corruption of authority is such that it is very difficult — at least in human terms — to hypothesize a peaceful way out.

In the course of history, totalitarian regimes have been overthrown by force.
It is difficult to think that the health dictatorship that has been established in recent months can be fought differently, since all the powers of the State, all of the means of information, all the international public and private institutions, all of the economic and financial potentates are complicit in this crime.

Faced with this bleak scenario of corruption and conflict of interest, it is indispensable that all those who are not subservient to the globalist plan unite in a compact and cohesive front, in order to defend their natural and religious rights, their own health and that of their loved ones, their freedom, and their goods.

Where authority fails in its duties and indeed betrays the purpose for which it has been established, disobedience is not only lawful but obligatory: non-violent disobedience, at least for now, but determined and courageous.

Disobedience to the illegitimate and tyrannical diktats of ecclesiastical authority, wherever it shows itself to be an accomplice of the infernal plan of the New World Order.

CONCLUSION

Allow me to conclude this reflection with a brief spiritual thought.

Everything that we know, discover, and understand about the global conspiracy currently unfolding shows us a tremendous reality that is also at the same time sharp and clearly-defined: there are two sides, the side of God and the side of Satan, the side of the children of Light and the side of the children of darkness.
It is not possible to come to terms with the Enemy, nor is it possible to serve two masters (Mt 6:24).

The words of Our Lord must be engraved in our minds: “Whoever is not with Me is against Me, and whoever does not gather with Me scatters” (Mt 12:30).

Hoping to build a world government in which the Divine Kingship of Jesus Christ is outlawed is insane and blasphemous, and no one who has such a plan will ever succeed.

Where Christ reigns, peace, harmony and justice reign; where Christ does not reign, Satan is a tyrant.

Let us consider this well, whenever we have to choose whether to make agreements with the adversary in the name of a false peaceful coexistence!

And let those prelates and civil leaders who think that their complicity only affects economic or health issues, pretending not to know what is behind all this, also consider this well.

Let us turn to Christ, Christ who is the King of hearts, of families, of societies, and of nations.
Let us proclaim Him as Our King and Mary Most Holy as Our Queen.

Only in this way can the wicked project of the New World Order be defeated.

Only in this way can the Holy Church be purified of traitors and renegades.

And may God listen to our prayer.

What a Good “Reset” Would Look Like (As usual, Cabalist Jews have overreached. They have discredited themselves with the Afghan fiasco, the scamdemic and the mandatory “vaccines.”)

As usual, Cabalist Jews have overreached.They have discredited themselves with the Afghanfiasco, the scamdemic and the mandatory “vaccines.”
We have a unique opportunity to reflect, re-imagine
and reset our world so that it fosters humanity.
It’s a rare chance to throw off the baneful yokeof the satanist (Masonic Jewish)
central banking cartel which is responsible for incalculable suffering 
under the aegis of Communism, war, genocide, depression,
plandemics, terrorism, satanism, corruption, & depravity.

I sense a seismic shift. The bankers have overplayed their hand and exposed themselves and their Freemason vassals (our elected “leaders”) as traitors, gangsters, psychopaths, criminals, perverts and mass murderers. Sweden, Florida, Texas and South Dakota have broken ranks and proven that Covid 19 a lie. 
This is what a benevolent reset would entail.

1. First and foremost, the nations must take control over their credit and currency-creation. They would renounce all “debt” created out of thin air and create the medium of exchange by spending it into existence, debt-and-interest free.

2. mRNA vaccines would be banned. All politicians, journalists and medical officials who collaborated in the Covid hoax would be fired. Jacob Rothschild, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Tony Fauci would be tried for crimes against humanity and have their wealth confiscated and added to public coffers. Joe Biden would be jailed for rigging an election. The traitor Donald Trump will be tried for reality-show false opposition and dereliction of duty. All those complicit in the election rigging, including Trump, Pence, Congress and the Supreme Court judges would be fired and put on trial. The same applies to all those who promoted the covid hoax. Pharmaceutical companies will be broken up and rigorously regulated. Bill Gates, Klaws Swab, Anthony Fauci and George Soros would be put on trial.

3. Media and tech monopolies would be nationalized, broken up and resold to people who will guarantee free speech and the free flow of information. The CIA and FBI will be shut down and reorganized. Local and state police will be purged of Freemasons. 

4. Freemasonry would be banned. Its leading members would be tried and incarcerated. Freemasons would be banned from holding public office or employment.

5. Communists would be purged from the education system, especially universities. Universities would protect free speech and inquiry. Scientific method would be re-instated.Confederate statues would be restored. History will not be photo-shopped. 

6. Antifa, feminists and other Leftists would be sent to “re-education” camps.  Diversity, cancel culture and CRT would be banned and punished. Hiring would be gender and color blind. Illegal migrants who have not found employment will be deported.

7. Elections would be publicly funded. No private contributions would be permitted. Politicians would not be permitted to profit from their term in office. 

8. The promotion of Satanism, gender dysphoria, illegal migration, climate change and all globalist shibboleths would be punishable by fines and prison terms. 

9. Family values — marriage, fidelity, responsible parenthood — would be become government policy. Human life would be considered inviolate. Abortion would be scaled back or banned. A healthy national and racial pride would be encouraged. Everybody would be afforded opportunity on the basis of individual merit and industry.

10. There will be a collective effort to discern and enact the Creator’s Design. The public would be encouraged to celebrate the Miracle of Life and praise God!   
If these measures are adopted, mankind would step back from the abyss and regain the path to a world where humanity can flourish as intended. 

WHAT NEXT?

The bankers’ attempt to lockdown and mandate experimental “vaccines” for a phoney pandemic is going to fail. People are not going to put up with this bullshit. 

The bankers tend to double down when thwarted. The mRNA vaccines may unleash a new wave of illness which the media will blame on Covid “variants” and the “unvaccinated.” However, it will quickly become apparent that only the vaccinated are suffering and resistance to the jabs will stiffen.

Ultimately, the Communist will have to shut down the Internet to succeed, and that would impact all economic activity. Their great reset will fail. The bankers have overplayed their hand. They have exposed and discredited their system of covert control. The bankers will be left with their nuclear options: crash the financial system or start a nuclear war. But that would be preferable to what they have in store.

Organized Jewry has never made a secret of its malevolent plan for mankind. People are starting to pay attention as it unfolds.

It’s not too late for Organized Jewry to spare itself and humanity much trauma by changing course. It’s not too late for the Rothschildsto become humanity’s benefactors and enjoy the love, instead of hatred, of billions.